Go take down an antelope with only your teeth ;)
Teeth are not for killing -- I have sharp sticks for that -- they are for tearing meat which spent some time over the fire. I can assure my canines function perfectly well in that role :-P
There aren't objective morals, so I wanted to talk to people who actually had morals
Coherent, you're not.
But you don't have to fit into my notions of coherency :-)
I have sharp sticks for that
That's my point. You're cheating now. Lions don't cheat.
over the fire.
Carnivores can eat raw meat.
I can assure my canines function perfectly well in that role
Nah they work better for plant foods. They aren't even very sharp. Also, other herbivores have canines but whatever.
Regardless of this bs^ doesn't matter whether we have canines or not or whether they are useful or not and we both know that. I don't need to explain the natural fallacy to you.
Coherent, you're not.
...But you don't have to fit into my notions of c
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post, then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.
4. Unflag the two options "Notify me of new top level comments on this article" and "