fiddlemath comments on Programming the LW Study Hall - LessWrong

31 Post author: ShannonFriedman 15 March 2013 06:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fiddlemath 18 March 2013 11:09:38PM 8 points [-]

Later. Keep the project requirements small until it's working well. Get it to serve one desired purpose very well. Only then look at extending its use.

This is true for any coding project, but an order-of-magnitude more true for a volunteer project. If you want to get a programmer to actually volunteer for a project, convince them that the project will see great rewards while it's still small. In fact, you basically want to maximize intuitive value, while minimizing expected work. It feels so much better when your actual, original goal is achieved with a small amount of work than it feels when your tiny, first step is only the start of achieving your goal.

Comment author: Error 19 March 2013 04:24:07AM 2 points [-]

If there will be effort put into actually building something.

Yes, effort is going into actually building something. :-) Shannon got the ball rolling, and we'll be contacting some of the other volunteers in this thread over the next few days. We're currently exploring our design options. I'll make a post on the subject once we figure out the proper approach.

Later. Keep the project requirements small until it's working well.

Absolutely. Version 1 will be as minimal as possible. (probably equivalent to tinychat plus one or two features)

Comment author: curiousepic 19 March 2013 02:39:16PM 1 point [-]

Agreed in retrospect. Scope creep creeped up on me.