peter_hurford comments on Effective Altruism Through Advertising Vegetarianism? - LessWrong

20 Post author: peter_hurford 12 June 2013 06:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (551)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: peter_hurford 13 June 2013 03:45:50AM 6 points [-]

This is actually a really good point that makes me less confident in the effectiveness of vegetarianism advocacy.

Comment deleted 13 June 2013 06:18:20AM [-]
Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 13 June 2013 06:21:45AM 0 points [-]

If you weight expected value by neurons

Ah, but now I can turn myself into a utility monster by artificially enlarging my brain! Game over.

Comment author: ciphergoth 14 June 2013 09:16:55PM 2 points [-]

We're trying to work out how to make progress on moral questions today, not trying to lay down a rule for all eternity that future agents can't game.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 14 June 2013 09:53:30PM 1 point [-]

It was a joke.

Comment author: ciphergoth 15 June 2013 01:09:29PM 1 point [-]

Oops, sorry!

Comment author: CarlShulman 13 June 2013 06:22:56AM *  2 points [-]

Or by having kids. Or copying your uploaded self. Or re-engineering your nervous system in other ways...

Comment author: CarlShulman 13 June 2013 03:55:48AM *  0 points [-]

The bit about desirability bias, or the fact that the optimistic estimates involve claiming that vegetarian ads are vastly more effective than other kinds of moralized behavior-change ads with more accurate measurements of effect?

Comment author: peter_hurford 13 June 2013 04:42:55AM 1 point [-]

Both points. The question "why should vegetarianism advocacy be so much more effective than get out the vote advocacy?" is a good point. Since the study quality for get out the vote advocacy is so much higher, we should expect vegetarianism advocacy to end up about the same.

On the other hand, I do think vegetarianism advocacy is a lot more psychologically salient (pictures of suffering) than any case that can be made for voting. I've personally distributed some pro-voting pamphlets, and they're not very compelling at all.

Comment author: Brian_Tomasik 13 June 2013 05:17:14AM 2 points [-]

Good points, Carl! Jonah Sinick actually made the GOTV argument to me on a prior occasion, citing your essay on the topic.

One additional consideration is that nearly everyone knows about voting, but many people don't know about the cruelty of factory farms. This goes along with the low-hanging-fruit point.

I would not be surprised if, after tempering the figures by this outside-view prior, it takes a few hundred dollars to create a new veg year. Even if so, that's at most 1-2 orders of magnitude different from the naive conservative estimate.