Lukas_Gloor comments on Why Eat Less Meat? - LessWrong

48 Post author: peter_hurford 23 July 2013 09:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (513)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lukas_Gloor 24 July 2013 11:54:37AM 0 points [-]

It depends on one's reasons for vegetarianism. Personally I'm vegetarian because it prevents suffering. I don't value a species, I value individuals. A species is just a categorization that cannot feel pain or pleasure. We can imagine a continuous line-up of daughter, mother, grandmother and so on, up to the point of the last common ancestor of humans and cows, and then forwards in time again to modern cows. Within that line-up, there would be thousands of species, and virtually all of them went extinct already. A common definition of "species" is that groups of animals belong to different species if they cannot have fertile offspring together. I don't see how this is a relevant criterion for awarding moral concern to species rather than individuals. And as for the individual cows, yes, they would die eventually (and then we might as well eat them), but so they would if we keep breeding more cows for food-purposes, so I don't quite see the point.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 July 2013 12:39:24PM -1 points [-]

In that case, what's your plan to prevent the suffering of all the animals that will die should too many people switch to vegetarianism?

Comment author: Lukas_Gloor 24 July 2013 01:08:45PM 2 points [-]

Those very animals will also die if people don't switch to vegetarianism, and then new animals will be bred and they will die too.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 July 2013 01:27:19PM -2 points [-]

Yes, but it's bad. You're trying to stop animal death and suffering that is a product of our carnivorous habits by getting people to stop eating meat. But animals will also die and suffer as a result of us ceasing our carnivorous habits. What is your plan for preventing that?

Comment author: Lukas_Gloor 24 July 2013 01:59:03PM 1 point [-]

Fewer animals means fewer deaths and suffering. I don't need to solve every single problem in the universe if I want to do something good. Hopefully though, a future AI will be able to reengineer whole ecosystems so the sentient beings in them won't have the biological capacity for suffering anymore.