private_messaging comments on Rationalists Are Less Credulous But Better At Taking Ideas Seriously - LessWrong

43 Post author: Yvain 21 January 2014 02:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (285)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: private_messaging 22 January 2014 10:36:25PM *  3 points [-]

Maybe procrastinators are trying to over-estimate it to get themselves to do it...

The probabilities are nuts though. For the whole thing to be of use,

1: you must die in a right way to get frozen soon enough and well enough. (Rather unlikely for a young person, by the way).

2: cryonics must preserve enough data.

3: no event that causes you to lose cooling

4: the revival technology must arise and become cheap enough (before you are unfrozen)

5: someone should dispose of the frozen head by revival rather than by garbage disposal or something even nastier (someone uses frozen heads as expired-copyright data).

Note that it's the whole combined probability that matters for the decision to sign up. edit: and not just that, but compared to the alternatives - i.e. you can improve your chances by trying harder not to die, and you can use money/time for that instead of cryonics.

edit2: also, just 3 independent-ish components (freezing works, company doesn't bust, revival available) with high ignorance get you down to 12.5%

Comment author: fortyeridania 25 January 2014 06:50:14AM 1 point [-]

You might be interested in reading some other breakdowns of the conditions required for cryonics to work (and their estimates of the relevant probabilities):

Break Cryonics Down (March 2009, at Overcoming Bias)

How Likely Is Cryonics To Work? (September 2011, here at LW)

More Cryonics Probability Estimates (December 2012, also at LW)