Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Comment author: anonym 27 January 2012 07:35:43AM *  1 point [-]

I'm the same. Great one-on-one, and extremely awkward when there are two or more other people, which I find to be very exhausting due to the extra conversation dynamics you note. It's also very difficult too when you're the sort of person who likes to periodically be silent for a period in order to think more deeply about what you're talking about -- with more than one other person there, somebody else will just start a new conversation on a new topic to avoid the "dreaded silence".

Comment author: anonym 10 January 2012 04:30:05AM 3 points [-]

Do you mean complimentary, and not complementary?

Comment author: anonym 17 December 2011 08:12:28PM -1 points [-]

It's much better now. The only issue remaining is that the 'Frequently Asked Questions" is just a tiny bit too wide to fit on one line inside the containing box, so the 'ns' of 'Questions' sticks outside of the gray box it is supposed to be inside.

Comment author: anonym 13 December 2011 04:59:43PM 0 points [-]

On the topic of how the site looks in different browsers, and finding out whether the layout is borked on some browsers, you could use http://browsershots.org/.

At the moment though, it fails due to an internal server error when it tries to fetch http://friendly-ai.com/robots.txt. If you fix that, you should be able to easily see how the site looks in a bunch of different browsers on different operating systems.

Comment author: anonym 13 December 2011 04:54:24PM 0 points [-]

I also see the FAQ page as broken with 'Questions' in the header appearing overlayed on the #2 and #3 items in the 'contents' list. With Firefox 8 on Linux at default zoom, and zooming down to make the fonts smaller than normal does fix it.

I agree with nyan_sandwich that things would be much improved if the CSS used ems instead of pixels, which are guaranteed to break if users have non-standard fonts or font sizes or their browser happens to have different enough default CSS rules.

Comment author: anonym 04 October 2011 03:57:46AM 2 points [-]

He did say "all exact science", a phrasing I think he probably chose carefully, so I'd charitably interpret the remark as being about people uttering purported scientific truths.

In response to comment by Kevin on Rationality Drugs
Comment author: anonym 02 October 2011 03:05:42AM 0 points [-]

Please elaborate. In what ways have you found it to be mind-altering?

Comment author: anonym 02 October 2011 02:27:50AM 20 points [-]

It would be an error to suppose that the great discoverer seizes at once upon the truth, or has any unerring method of divining it. In all probability the errors of the great mind exceed in number those of the less vigorous one. Fertility of imagination and abundance of guesses at truth are among the first requisites of discovery; but the erroneous guesses must be many times as numerous as those that prove well founded. The weakest analogies, the most whimsical notions, the most apparently absurd theories, may pass through the teeming brain, and no record remain of more than the hundredth part….

W. Stanley Jevons

Comment author: anonym 02 October 2011 02:17:17AM 39 points [-]

Although this may seem a paradox, all exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. When a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in inferring that he is an inexact man.

Bertrand Russell

Comment author: anonym 02 October 2011 02:13:23AM 12 points [-]

The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover new ways of thinking about them.

William Lawrence Bragg

View more: Next