You've done basically zero of the hard work required to rally people behind a successful protest (other than write this announcement)
Isn't this how most social movements start – with a single protest, attended by a small number of people?
You'd really need a concrete policy ask before I would think of joining your protest
I think this is why Percy posted here: to discuss what that might look like! And perhaps he doesn't need specific demands – look at Occupy Wall Street as an example of a movement with underspecified/vague demands that was effective in some ways (and failed in others).
More generally I don't really like the dynamic where the first person to say "me" is suddenly able to direct a bunch of free-energy
Again – surely this is how all social movements start? This picket won't be perfect; in my view it will highly likely be better than nothing.
I do think you could do something smarter than this attempt, and try harder to figure out what might work.
Do you have any suggestions?
Dilemma ("choose a side") is a principle of non-violent direct action; why is an us vs. them mentality necessarily a bad thing? Do you oppose protest in principle?
Would you say this about the climate movement pressuring fossil fuel companies to transition away from fossil fuels?
I think we need both – here's evidence for the radical flank effect.
Strongly agree – and this is how all mass movements start, no?