Reposting my comment from lukeprog's thread with slight edits.
It would be useful for me if some of you guys shared your methodology of choosing textbook / course / whatever for learning X, especially if X has something to do with math, computer science or programming.
My methodology (especially for math, computer science and programming) (in no particular order):
New ideas which I haven't tried yet:
It would be useful for me if some of you guys shared your methodology of choosing textbook / course / whatever for learning X, especially if X has something to do with math, computer science or programming.
My methodology (in no particular order):
Post the title of your favorite textbook on a given subject.
You must have read at least two other textbooks on that same subject.
You must briefly name the other books you've read on the subject and explain why you think your chosen textbook is superior to them.
Subject: Probability Theory
Recommendation: Feller's An Introduction to Probability Theory is better than Jaynes' Probability Theory: The Logic of Science and MIT OpenCourseware: Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Jaynes' book probably has more insight for someone who already knows probability theory very well. MIT course should be better if you want ot learn some probability theory and statistics very fast skipping proofs and other stuff. Feller's book is better if you want to learn a lot of probability theory, you have a lot of time and Jaynes' book is too difficult for you.
You claim that posting attention to some kind of pain might make you feel that pain stronger in the future. However Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction supposedly makes you feel better despite chronic pains. It inckudes mindful meditation, which has you pay attention to how your body feels. This seems to be a contradiction with what you claim, because of you pay attention to it, it will become worse, as you say.
The title misled me: I though this would be useful if me and another person decided to write a piece of fiction together.
Apparently this post is for people who write things and let other people comment on them, make little changes and suggest edits. But there is still one main author.
Actually the LW Study Hall uses 32-8.
I have taken the survey.
I am not sure, are you saying, that for some fields "works by the giants of the 20th century" is great, while modern material is bad?