Posts

Sorted by New

Wiki Contributions

Comments

Sorted by

a particular technique doesn’t immediately solve a problem

I remember a story that got coverage on the state radio in New Zealand years ago.  It said that multiple people have parts of the solution to some problem, and there is progress when there is an accident that introduces them to each other.  There was a book about it, but I'm failing to find the details.

implement a relatively limited policy

I read this as Libertarian; the hope that there could be a very stiff, strong government that was also small, and did only a subset of the things in the short-term interest of its supporters.

Alignment isn’t like that; it was chosen to be an important problem

Like medicine.

This was specifically commented on in a book whose preface I read as a child.  It was called something like "Medicine: from science to magic", and I have not found a clear link back to it.

Furthe to Matt,

I like this distinction.  At the cost of generalising from fiction, in "A Civil Campaign", Lois McMaster Bujold phrased it as: "Reputation is what other people know about you. Honour is what you know about yourself."  Quoted here:

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WhatYouAreInTheDark/Literature

Further to Kaj and Eric,

a fear of the career consequences of being in the line of fire

this sounds like people who are in the middle of an Immoral Maze.  That's probably statistically true, because any corporation large enough to be worth attacking is probably large enough to have three layers of middle-management.

Assuming that, doing 'honour' requires having goals other than power-seeking which, according to that sequence, makes one untrustworthy for the modal middle-manager, who has sacrificed everything else to it, and professionally doomed.