Not sure what exactly should count as appropriate, I had assumed that the votes would sort the good from the bad, but maybe people would be less inclined to downvote a book they liked, which could be a problem with a well-liked book.

Is it enough that these comments could serve as a warning, or do you suggest I delete/edit the post?

The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins

Godel, Escher, Bach, Douglas Hofstadter

Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Thomas Gilovich and Dale Griffin

Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, collection edited by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Paul Slovic

Dont understand the "activity" part, the post implied sleeping was fine, so does breathing count?

Stop fussing over voting! Now!

It's an important part of the site, and it'll pay off if it's done well.

Requesting a short summary of the current plans for future changes the voting system, preferably from someone in a position to know.

It's probably not mentioned enough that cryonics can be justified even if it looks like it probably wont work, as long as it's past some threshold.