Ok done... and registered for my first point (if you don't mind!). Enjoyed the probability questions.
Issues I had were,
inadequate categorisation of political views.
inadequate categorisation for morality. I don't think many people here would answer deontologist, I don't know what Eliezers consequentialism is, so its basically a choice of consequentialism or other.
Most of the caterogies are well established and main stream umbrella terms that assume a good corelation between category and view set. Actually I think they should be avoided as associating with them comes down to tacitly agreeing with more than one proposition. So more single proposition (for/against) questions would be better ...
for question about charity. You should reread the options,
Ok done... and registered for my first point (if you don't mind!). Enjoyed the probability questions.
Issues I had were,
Most of the caterogies are well established and main stream umbrella terms that assume a good corelation between category and view set. Actually I think they should be avoided as associating with them comes down to tacitly agreeing with more than one proposition. So more single proposition (for/against) questions would be better ...
- for question about charity. You should reread the options,
... (read more)