While good to have for reference, I didn't find the enormous tables on Wikipedia helpful. Using the mass of the Earth as an example, I have no intuition for the number ${10}^{24}$ : it's just ten apples with twenty-four smaller apples floating next to them (relevant xkcd). And I don't think memorizing these numbers, with spaced repetition or otherwise, is all that helpful for intuition-building.

For astronomical distances, what I have found helpful is to do everything in terms of the speed of light (${10}^{8.5}$ m/s = a foot per nanosecond).  The sun is 8 minutes = 500 seconds away. The moon is 1.5 seconds away. Jupiter is 45 minutes away, and doubles every step to Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.

For the circumference of the Earth, the distance from the pole to the equator is a nice, round, 10,000 km. (Remarkably convenient coincidence!)

For masses, use the density of water: the Sun and all the gas giants are the same density as water. Earth is the density of rock, about $\sqrt{10}$ that of water. The density of metal is 10 times water.

I suspect the real reason is stopping competitors fine-tuning on o1's CoT, which they also come right out and say:

Therefore, after weighing multiple factors including user experience, competitive advantage, and the option to pursue the chain of thought monitoring

See also: Great Moments in Unintended Consequences playlist.

Quenya resources you might find useful (though you've probably seen most of these):

• The Vinyë Lambengolmor Discord - Extremely helpful community.
• Eldamo - The main dictionary (includes lots of useful neologisms), but it also has an intro to Quenya.
• Quettali - Constructs the declension and conjugation tables for the words in Eldamo's dictionary. (Mirror: ungwe.net)

If you also want to write in the Tengwar, see Tecendil and BSSScribe.

Thinking in Quenya might not be a reasonable goal.

incorrect/misleading/unclear statements

I disagree that his statements are misleading: the impression someone who believed them true would have is far more accurate than someone who believed them false. Is that not more relevant, and a better measure of honesty, than whether or not they're "incorrect"? 

Remember: Bear spray does not work like bug spray!

"Medicine" is itself an example of the "noncentral fallacy" you criticize: it includes great things like surgery and trauma medicine, vaccination, treatments based on actual understanding of biology like insulin, and  miscellaneous drugs that are claimed to do useful things for mysterious reasons. While there are certainly effective things in that last category, like antibiotics and painkillers, the "epistemics" of the field strike me as pretty shit: if quinine were proposed as a treatment for malaria today, I expect the medical establishment to say things like "that's tree bark juice. You are not a squirrel."

The local flavor of quackery where I grew up was Ayurveda, and my view of the herbal remedies suggested by its practitioners is they're no worse than what they called "allopathy": try the thing, and if it works, it works.

Ah! Might I recommend Tengwar Artano instead? It uses the same glyphs, but includes many modern "smart font" features, such as ligatures, automatic under/overbar widths, and improved diacritic placement. (And perhaps most usefully, and my primary motivation for reëncoding it, it's easy to use it with XeLaTeX.)

Also, you probably want to use the Quenya mode mode for Namárië.

They do the same thing with "child pornography": that's mostly teenagers sexting. And a girl was convicted for it too, charged with distributing child pornography of herself: link.