1. Nail biting offers no intrinsic reward or pleasure. It isn't something I consciously enjoy or value.

couldn't work for me cause I lowkey love nail biting. didn't know other people were getting fucked up nails without the enjoyment

But how do you distinguish this argument from other arguments that prove false things?

I remember the mom saying it was a wig in the Tucker Carlson interview.

what was up with the alleged wig?

The terminally online TPOT Xitter slander is so false I mean there is different parts but for example, at vibecamp 2 (summer 2023) there was a question from the stage like "who thinks AI will kill us" and I think more than 1/3 present raised their hands. Which maybe still we're not worth persuading. But if you'd want to I think you should hash it out with prof. Hanson, he seems to have a take that's smart and hard to reconcile with less wrong thought. "Epistemic daddy uncertainty" they call it.

android phone with google chrome

(related phenomena can be observed by scrolling to the 16-17 boundary and lowering the browser window width)

There are typos in the articles for example the category theory one:

A statement about terminal object is that any

maybe "terminal object" was a link with "s" added at the end but it reverted to its natural form in the importing process

there's weird shit going on on mobile like items 1-16 scroll a but horizontally 

For 99% of random^[3] reversible circuits $C$, no such $\pi$ exists.

What's the proportion of circuits where P(C) is true? 

if they were written today I'd be like "that's giga obvious"