In today’s digital era, teenagers face a dual challenge: processing vast amounts of information and maintaining emotional well-being. Traditional educational models, focused on memorization and mechanical procedures, might be better suited to preparing students for complex decision-making in an increasingly uncertain world.
As part of a non-profit Latín American education initiative, Jacominesp, I seek to connect with members os LessWrong who are interested in collaborating on the development of a program that integrates rational thinking, data analysis, and personal development for young people. Would there be interest in participating or contributing ideas?
1.1 Health and Well-being
World Health Organization (WHO) statistics indicate that in 2019, nearly a billion people, including 14% of teenagers globally, were affected by some mental disorder. World Health Organization
Moreover, it’s estimated that over 20% of adolescents worldwide suffer from mental health disorders, with suicide being the second leading cause of death among youth aged 15 to 19. UNICEF
In terms of education, it’s been observed that although the school curriculum emphasizes abstract concepts, it often lacks approaches that connect these concepts with practical applications in everyday life. This can hinder students from making better life decisions. Educrea
1.2 Behavioral Economics and Our Choices
Research by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky has revolutionized our understanding of decision-making. Their studies show how our values and identity influence our choices, especially in complex or long-term decisions, and highlight the need for models to help us reason better in today’s world—even when linking decisions to self-knowledge and well-being.
2. SOLUTIONS
2.1 Practical Models for Better Decisions
Several good models have been developed to help us make better decisions:
SMART Goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound)
First Principles Method
2.2 Awareness and Mindfulness
Mindfulness practice has been shown to be useful for making more conscious decisions. By developing the ability to observe and label our impulses and emotions in the present moment, we reduce automatic reactions and increase mental clarity. This can help us distinguish momentary impulses from deeper goals.
2.3 Learning from the Best Decision-Makers
The Good Judgment Community Forecasting Project, funded by DARPA, studied the characteristics of top forecasters ("superforecasters") who can best use information for decision-making. These individuals demonstrated:
Strong analytical thinking
Intellectual curiosity
Flexibility in adjusting opinions
Probability-based focus
Humility and eagerness to learn
3. Proposal: 'Estimat - Values and Data’s For Starters'
By combining intellectual and emotional approaches through the lens of information theory and fuzzy mathematics, we can establish measurable values.
3.1 Key Components
Personal Scoring System (PSS)
Self-evaluation per activity through quantifiable metrics
Goal tracking with specific indicators
Continuous data-driven feedback
3.2 Practical Learning Modules
Applied probability in everyday decisions and emergency situations
Personal data analysis
Optimization of routines and habits
Quantified emotional management
3.3 Implementation Methodology
Phase 1: Diagnosis
Initial assessment of motivations, goals, and routines
Initial bias assessment
Initial assessment of mathematical competencies
Establishing baseline data
Phase 2: Development
Weekly interactive workshops
Guided personal projects
Peer mentorship
Phase 3: Monitoring
Continuous evaluation through key indicators
Personalized adjustments based on progress
Structured feedback
4. Expected Benefits
4.1 Short-Term:
Improved analytical skills
Reduced anxiety in decision-making
Increased self-awareness
4.2 Long-Term:
Development of critical thinking
Greater emotional resilience
Enhanced planning skills
Conclusion and Personal Reflection
During my exploration and application of these and other decision-making models, I encountered a recurring limitation: they are often too abstract and subjective, making systematic and measurable implementation challenging. This observation led me to develop a more mathematical and quantifiable approach for my own self-knowledge and decision-making process.
By applying information theory principles to my personal development, I find indications that I can:
Reduce ambiguity in progress assessment
Set more objective parameters to measure success
Create a more replicable and verifiable system
I see an approach using information theory and fuzzy mathematics could be valuable for teenagers. I’m curious if other community members have experienced similar limitations with traditional models and if they would see utility in a more quantitative self-knowledge system.
Would a framework combining data analysis with practical tools for personal development be useful for teenagers?
Would there be interest from LessWrong community in help this type of proposal that combines rationality, data analysis, and personal development?
1. PROBLEM
In today’s digital era, teenagers face a dual challenge: processing vast amounts of information and maintaining emotional well-being. Traditional educational models, focused on memorization and mechanical procedures, might be better suited to preparing students for complex decision-making in an increasingly uncertain world.
As part of a non-profit Latín American education initiative, Jacominesp, I seek to connect with members os LessWrong who are interested in collaborating on the development of a program that integrates rational thinking, data analysis, and personal development for young people. Would there be interest in participating or contributing ideas?
1.1 Health and Well-being
World Health Organization (WHO) statistics indicate that in 2019, nearly a billion people, including 14% of teenagers globally, were affected by some mental disorder. World Health Organization
Moreover, it’s estimated that over 20% of adolescents worldwide suffer from mental health disorders, with suicide being the second leading cause of death among youth aged 15 to 19. UNICEF
In terms of education, it’s been observed that although the school curriculum emphasizes abstract concepts, it often lacks approaches that connect these concepts with practical applications in everyday life. This can hinder students from making better life decisions. Educrea
1.2 Behavioral Economics and Our Choices
Research by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky has revolutionized our understanding of decision-making. Their studies show how our values and identity influence our choices, especially in complex or long-term decisions, and highlight the need for models to help us reason better in today’s world—even when linking decisions to self-knowledge and well-being.
2. SOLUTIONS
2.1 Practical Models for Better Decisions
Several good models have been developed to help us make better decisions:
2.2 Awareness and Mindfulness
Mindfulness practice has been shown to be useful for making more conscious decisions. By developing the ability to observe and label our impulses and emotions in the present moment, we reduce automatic reactions and increase mental clarity. This can help us distinguish momentary impulses from deeper goals.
2.3 Learning from the Best Decision-Makers
The Good Judgment Community Forecasting Project, funded by DARPA, studied the characteristics of top forecasters ("superforecasters") who can best use information for decision-making. These individuals demonstrated:
3. Proposal: 'Estimat - Values and Data’s For Starters'
By combining intellectual and emotional approaches through the lens of information theory and fuzzy mathematics, we can establish measurable values.
3.1 Key Components
3.2 Practical Learning Modules
3.3 Implementation Methodology
Phase 1: Diagnosis
Phase 2: Development
Phase 3: Monitoring
4. Expected Benefits
4.1 Short-Term:
4.2 Long-Term:
Conclusion and Personal Reflection
During my exploration and application of these and other decision-making models, I encountered a recurring limitation: they are often too abstract and subjective, making systematic and measurable implementation challenging. This observation led me to develop a more mathematical and quantifiable approach for my own self-knowledge and decision-making process.
By applying information theory principles to my personal development, I find indications that I can:
I see an approach using information theory and fuzzy mathematics could be valuable for teenagers. I’m curious if other community members have experienced similar limitations with traditional models and if they would see utility in a more quantitative self-knowledge system.
Would a framework combining data analysis with practical tools for personal development be useful for teenagers?
Would there be interest from LessWrong community in help this type of proposal that combines rationality, data analysis, and personal development?