Following http://lesswrong.com/lw/bwo/logical_fallacy_poster/ some people complained about
- the sarcastic illustration
- the lack of references
- the weird categorization that should rather fit a Bayesian framework
- the simplistic or even wrong definitions
- and more
Yet this poster has ONE key difference with the ideal poster, it exists.
If it sparks criticisms that lead to a new, LessWrong compatible poster, then it is well worth the critics.
The obvious next step then is to make a poster that would allow to take into account such well founded suggestion and synthesize the LessWrong lessons visually.
In your opinion then what would be a good structure, e.g. a hierarchy of fallacies, and a design theme?
Is a poster of logical fallacies really something worth expending effort on? I'd find a crib-sheet of cognitive biases, illuminative cognitive disorders or helpful terminology way more useful. It'd need continuously updating, of course.
Much of the prep work would seem to be useful for the creation of both.