Exercise for “Extensions and Intensions”
Give an intensional definition for each of the following words:
- Shoe
- Hope
- Wire
- Green
- Politician
- Apple
Now rank them from easiest to define to hardest.
Describe how you would give an extensional definition of the same words:
- Shoe
- Hope
- Wire
- Green
- Politician
- Apple
Again, rank them from easiest to hardest.
Are the two lists the same? If not, what tends to make something easier to define intensionally than extensionally and vice versa?
You can share your answers in the comments. I'm interested in seeing how similarly people think of these things. Please make suggestions as to how this could be improved or augmented and what to do the same/differently in future exercises. My current plan is to do more from the sequence "A Human's Guide to Words." This post will be edited in response to suggestions.
Intensional:
From the easiest to the hardest: apple, green, wire, shoe, hope, politician
Extensional:
From the easiest to the hardest: green, wire, politician, shoe, apple, hope
Apple was much easier for to define intensionally than extensionally because the membership criterion is straightforward, but I can't think of any specimen of apple the listener is likely to have seen. Politician was the other way round because there are lots of well-known people or classes of people who I'd consider to be politicians, but I can't think of a good-enough criterion.
(How damn hard is it to get the list markup to work?!?!)