They're absolutely right to focus on pollution aspects.
Gray goo is not an imminent threat. Neither current top-down methods nor bottom-up methods are anywhere near sufficient to the task.
This is entirely to do with the products of present-day chemistry and has nothing to do with Drexlerian molecular nanotechnology except the name.
Those concerned about existential risks may be interested to learn that, as of last September, the National Science Foundation is funding a Center for Sustainable Nanotechnology. Though I haven't yet seen anywhere where they explicitly characterize nanotechnology as an existential threat to humanity (they seem mostly to be concerned with the potential hazards of nanoparticle pollution, rather than any kind of grey goo scenario), I was still pleased to discover that this group exists.
Here is how they describe themselves on their main page:
And on their public outreach website: