by [anonymous]
1 min read

40

.

New Comment
13 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

The Harvard Gazette begins with:

Antanas Mockus had just resigned from the top job of Colombian National University.

I'm amused it doesn't say why. (He was going to talk on a stage; students were shouting so loud he couldn't speak; he mooned them, they shut up, he gave his talk. On national television, too.)

[Edit] It does say why, but a while into the article.

I have to say: he certainly 'won'. Rationality or not, that is one impressive list of results.

Awesome :)

[-][anonymous]00

Is there a difference between a "radical instrumental rationalist" and an unconventionally successful leader?

[-][anonymous]10

.

Do you mean for "unconventionally" to modify "successful"? A leader who is successful in unconventional ways, if they intended the success, might be, but I think they'd have to (warning, tvtropes link) intend to be.

[-][anonymous]00

.

This article has numbers in it, on the near side of the link.

[-][anonymous]00

.

This is good information on what sorts of things it takes to get a reader to invest their time- don't ignore it.

[-][anonymous]20

.

Maybe people like to hear about state-level ideas more than person-level ideas. Or maybe these ideas are more specific, while the article/documentary about Dolly Freed was more of a story.

[-][anonymous]00

.