All of beza1e1's Comments + Replies

beza1e1390

Sounds somewhat like exploiting the Fundamental Attribution Error. Other people (including imagined selves) are not that much influenced by external situational factors in our minds. Thus, they act more consistent with their internal characteristics. ActualMe is always thrown around by external forces and emotion chaos.

beza1e120

One thing I would add - Writing a gratitude journal once a week has been shown to be more effective than doing it daily (Sonja Lyubomirsky 2007)

I found two publications by Lyubomirsky in 2007. Only one contained something remotely similar to your claim:

Tkach (2005) demonstrated that participants who were randomly assigned to vary the types of kind acts they would perform on a weekly basis showed higher levels of happiness and well- being 10 weeks later relative to those who did not vary their kind acts, and relative to comparison controls.

However, t... (read more)

beza1e120

Poker is an excellent teaching vehicle. It really motivates to learn about probabilities, because it makes you win. It teaches you the emotional strength to accept sunk costs, because it reduces your unavoidable losses.

4EGarrett
I find poker to be a fantastic teaching tool. You make the best decisions and then are confronted with results that vary wildly in the short-term. Over time though, the correct decisions and behavior pay off. This is a perfect model (in a simplified form) for how things like patience and morality function in the real world. They don't guarantee immediate payoffs and short-term success, they work most often and most reliably over long time frames.
0AshwinV
Interesting. It was also suggested on this website that "magic" is also a good vehicle to teach rationality. Do you think there are any other things that can be classified as the same? Perhaps a list of characteristics that can be used to judge an activity as a good for rationality development?