All of ctietze's Comments + Replies

Re: Luhmann's productivity, see the list of published books (! not counting articles !): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklas_Luhmann -- he was a prolific producer of texts.

You're right, all this can be done on a computer just fine. And you even get full-text search and such quality of life improvements.

The "key" to his productivity was not just doing all the steps you mention mindlessly for 30 years and voila, you have tons of books. Have you ever contributed to a wiki, e.g. at work? When you know 10 things but none of them are on the ... (read more)

"Identifiers" would be more like addresses. A computer metaphor: if you have files, you can think of the path to the file as its identifier. Luhmann used an alphanumeric code (which I think is obsolete on the computer) but you can go with date-time stamps like 202002270807 for 2020-02-27 08:07 or similar. Or you use the title of the note. But then you cannot change the title anymore without breaking links, which makes it brittle.

Linking essentially works exactly as you described: leave the address in other notes in your archive.

1pcm50
This is an area where technology has made the original method obsolete. In Obsidian (as I use it) one can add #tags, which are automatically indexed, and [[internal_doc_links]] which can be automatically updated on move / rename. There's no longer any need to spend time thinking about how to organize this unique id system as though you needed to put a physical card into a linearly ordered physical pile. Not doing so reduces the friction of taking notes. For me this is very powerful.