All of eagain's Comments + Replies

eagain00

I don't think I have ever seen you make a concrete constructive proposal about anything, as opposed to objecting to other people's.

Hmm. That sounds like a nice rule: anyone who spends all their posting efforts on objecting to other people's ideas without putting forth anything constructive of their own shall be banned, or at least downvoted into oblivion.

0gjm
I think that would be excessive. Pointing out others' mistakes is a useful activity. (Think of Socrates.) Also, downvoting is disabled right now.
eagain20

I didn't say excluded from the conversation. I said exposed to the bright, glaring sunlight of factual rigor.

-1Lumifer
These words do not appear anywhere in your comment. Instead you said: "Don't go beyond that" seems to mean not allowing those politics and the bad-idea raiders. "Not allowing" does not mean "expose to sunlight", it means "exclude".
-1TheAncientGeek
Which isnt being done because of what...? Widespread stupidity?
eagain10

Only an ill-posed problem can never be solved, in principle.

0TheAncientGeek
Is there a clear, algorithmic way of determining which problems are ill posed?
eagain10

Have you considered that there may be a lot of endless hashing out, not because some people have a preference for it, but because the problems are genuinely difficult?

I've considered that view and found it wanting, personally. Not every problem can be solved right now with an empirical test or a formal model. However, most that can be solved right now, can be solved in such a way, and most that can't be solved in such a way right now, can't be solved at all right now. Adding more "hashing out of big questions" doesn't seem to actually help;... (read more)

-1TheAncientGeek
Can you tell which problems can never be solved?
eagain70

Hi. I used to have an LW account and post sometimes, and when the site kinda died down I deleted the account. I'm posting back now.

We claim to have some of the sharpest thinkers in the world, but for some reason shun discussing politics. Too difficult, we're told. A mindkiller! This cost us Yvain/Scott who cited it as one of his reasons for starting slatestarcodex, which now dwarfs LW.

Please do not start discussing politics without enforcing a real-names policy and taking strong measures against groupthink, bullying, and most especially brigading fro... (read more)

0gjm
I remark that this is not a million miles from what Eugine_Nier tried to do, and unfortunately he was not entirely unsuccessful. (Though he didn't get nearly as far as producing a homogeneous consensus in favour of his ideas.)
2Lumifer
Ha-ha You seem to have a desire to discuss the topic only in a tightly controlled environment where you get to establish the framework and set the rules.
0Elo
I would rather politics happen in all those other places you mentioned.