All of folkTheory's Comments + Replies

Hello and welcome! I love your enthusiasm for learning!

Yes, feel free to ask things in the discussion threads.

I could really benefit from a better note taking system such as the one you mention in item 2. Could you give me some pointers for improving note taking? Relatedly, what system/app do you use for the note taking?

1RomeoStevens
I use workflowy, the key for me is to not worry about messy ontologies and just clean it up every once in a while. If you search for something and can't find it, be sure to add the first search term you tried to use to the thing once you do find it.
7PeteMichaud
Thank you so much!

This is fantastic Malcolm, thank you!

I recently got into practicing meditation, and got a lot out of the old LW posts about it. I was wondering if there is any interest to have a meditation retreat for rationalists?

7beoShaffer
I know that Val from CfAR at least used to run meditation retreats though they weren't aimed specifically at rationalists.
4ChristianKl
I think it would be interesting but I see no good reason to do a retreat for specifically for rationalists. I'm not sure whether there are people in this community who are at the 10,000 hour skill level. It's probably easier to find that outside. I'm apologizing in advance for a bit of bit irreducible spirituality. I try to keep it to a minimum. I have two experiences of group meditations among rationalists. On was last year at the European Community Camp in Berlin. It felt like there was nobody in the room who gave the thing stability. In the dose of 15-20 minutes that's not harmful but I wouldn't expect a few days in that state to be good. I lead a meditation during the solstice celebration in Leipzig and only used 20 minutes of 30 that I had asked for on the agenda, because that felt enough. In total that leads me to think that meditation makes a decent agenda item at an LW event but no good program for a complete day. At least without someone to lead the event who really knows what they are doing.

Alternative title: How To Live For Very Very Long And Yet Not Live At All.

3JoshuaZ
The vast majority of these issues are minor, easy to change aspects of life, which will not substantially impact how much enjoyment most people get out of life.

I'm signed up for the programming one. This'll be my first time at CFAR. pretty excited!

1palladias
Awesome! Can't wait to have you.

I am not currently married.

I'm trying to decide whether to marry someone, but I'm having a lot of trouble deciding. Anyone have any advice?

2Shmi
If in doubt, don't. There is rarely a good reason to formalize a relationship these days until you are absolutely sure that he/she is the one.
0Eliezer Yudkowsky
Are you already married? What do your current spouses say?
2Dorikka
You might be interested in the textbook that I recommended here, which includes some general information about patterns in relationships that predict how-long-people-that-are-married-stay-married. I am aware that I am recommending a 500 page textbook in response to your request for advice, and that this is kinda absurd. I am not familiar enough with the material to be able to (given the amount of effort that I am willing to dedicate to the task) summarize the relevant information for you, but figured that the link would be literally better than nothing.
drethelin120

1) do you plan on spending a long period of time in a relationship with someone?

2) you have a job where they will get benefits from being married to you or vice versa?

3) do you expect to have children or buy property soon?

4) do you hang out with people who care whether or not you're married rather than just a long-term couple?

5) do you expect the other person to ever leave you and take half your stuff?

6) do you want to have a giant ceremony?

7) do you live in a country where you get tax credits or something for being married?

8) do you expect yourself or the... (read more)

Lumifer110

Other than in special circumstance, I think marriage is one of these occasions where "having trouble deciding" pretty clearly means "NO".

0bogdanb
Start with a list :-) First figure out why you’re trying to decide that (the pros) and write it down. Then figure why you haven’t decided yet (the cons) and write those down. If writing them down isn’t enough, try to figure out a way to put numbers on each item. (Exactly what kind of numbers depends on you, and figuring that is part of the solution.) If that doesn’t work, then ask for help, with the list.

Does anyone know of a way to convert .anki files to .apkg files?

I recently started using anki, but most of the decks I downloaded are .anki, and can't be opened by ankidroid...

It would be completely random, with all events being equally likely at every point in time. It would have no history, since the past has no effect on the present or future

3The_Duck
How do you know that?

Is there some reason this article hasn't been promoted to the frontpage?

But, from the article:

you can nonetheless take many literary professors and separately show them new pieces of writing by unknown authors and they'll all independently arrive at the same answer, in which case they're clearly detecting some sensory-visible feature of the writing.

Seems like what I was saying...

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply

I don't understand the part about post-utopianism being meaningless. If people agree on what the term means, and they can read a book and detect (or not) colonial alienation, and thus have a test for post-utopianism, and different people will reach the same conclusions about any given book, then how exactly is the term meaningless?

6fortyeridania
I think "postmodernism," "colonial alienation," and "post-utopianism" are all meant to be blanks, which we're supposed to fill in with whatever meaningless term seems appropriate. But I share your uneasiness about using these terms. First, I don't know enough about postmodernism to judge whether it's a field filled with empty phrases. (Yudkowsky seems to take the Sokal affair as a case-closed demonstration of the vacuousness of postmodernism. However, it is less impressive than it may seem at first. The way the scandal is presented by some"science-types"--as an "emperor's new clothes" story, with pretentious, obfuscationist academics in the role of the court sycophants--does not hold up well after reading the Wikipedia article. The editors of Social Text failed to adhere to appropriate standards of rigor, but it's not like they took one look at Sokal's manuscript and were floored by its pseudo-brilliance.) Second, I suspect there aren't any clear-cut examples of meaningless claims out there that actually have any currency.(I only suspect this; I'm not certain. Some things seem meaningless to me; however, that could be just because I'm an outsider.) Counterexamples?
2thomblake
By hypothesis, none of those things are true. If those things happen to be true for "post-utopianism" in the real world, substitute a different word that people use inconsistently and doesn't refer to anything useful.

and hence normal people's acceptance that nerd-contradictory things can be normal-"true" at the same time.

Namespaced that for you.

2SilasBarta
People need to do that more often!
0DaFranker
Thank you. That saved me a second (and perhaps third) read; the sentence had me confused.

It leads to annoyance for me. Whenever you switch into a tab, it starts loading (from the point of view of someone who wasn't aware the page hadn't loaded, it seemed to be reloading). As soon as I saw BrassLion's post, I went into the options and disabled it.

I'm moving to Seattle in September. If you're looking to move in that area, send me a PM or comment.

Learning introductory physics and statistics at Udacity

So which audiobooks would you recommend?

despite what anyone, including EY, says.

I'm pretty sure I recall that EY says (repeatedly) that the Born rule is not yet understood.

0Nornagest
A genre of commentary or critical response that involves blogging running comments as you go through a work. Something Awful's "Let's Play" series might be the best-known examples.

The old wizard reached out toward another metal door, from behind which came a endless dead mutter, "I'm not serious, I'm not serious, I'm not serious..." The red-golden phoenix on his shoulder was already screaming urgently, and the old wizard was already wincing, when -

I'm not too sure Sirius has been Azkabanned at all...

So, should I start consuming butter half-sticks?

6vali
The study had just 27 participants, and wasn't double blind. While it was an interesting experiment, I certainly wouldn't act on it, except perhaps to read another, similar experiment.
1Alicorn
At least eat them with something, ew. Melt it in a pan and fry something in it.

Yeah. I mean the idea of scheduling a time for people to massively go in there, sounds like a good idea.

Looks like DC has one (TEDxDupontCircle). I think I will go.

Also, the LW chat room sounds like a great idea.

0gwern
Could just hijack #lesswrong. Not usually anything important going on.

Hey, I've been doing this for a few days and it's been extremely helpful. Thank you for posting this!

A bit more about it: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/9z4/on_journaling/5vdf

inspired by this post: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/9t2/what_are_you_working_on_february_2012/5u5g

I recently started tracking any time I interrupt my work. What I do is write down in my e-journal what time I stopped working (dog needs to be walked, check reddit, bathroom break, etc.) and what time I resumed work. I also write next to each stop time the cumulative time I've been working (on that day). It's really helpful to see how much time of pure solid work you've done and has helped me work for longer.

Quick question, what website do you use for your journal?

3Shmi
I use a google docs spreadsheet, and I also track the (real) reason for the task switching. As I said, sometimes having to write an honest reason for switching is enough to prevent switching to a low-priority or a totally unnecessary task (e.g. "I want to check the forum to see if my karma went up, and I cannot wait till the end of the day because I'm so vain")
0RobertLumley
I'm using OneNote/Excel. I just keep it on my Windows Skydrive.

Thank you, this seems very interesting. I'll try it out soon.

0Vaniver
Apparently it didn't actually give us 7 days for players to join, and so the game got canceled. Have remade the game with the same password.

It is strongly implied by canon and Word of God (JKR) that: Qhzoyrqber naq Tevaqryjnyq jrer ybiref.

1hairyfigment
Which explains why Dumbledore might wait (ETA: wait to fight Grindelwald, I mean, not draw out the fight once it started), without wanting to deceive the world or having the motives Draco ascribes to him. It makes Albus look bad in a different way, but given our other knowledge I think it counts as evidence against your interpretation.
5Desrtopa
I believe she stated that Qhzoyrqber jnf vasnghngrq jvgu Tevaqryjnyq, naq Tevaqryjnyq xarj vg, ohg qvqa'g erpvcebpngr. I think that the whole thing about the wielder of the Elder Wand being unbeatable in a duel was mythic exaggeration in the original canon; it was just a lot more powerful than ordinary wands.

That duel was a faked show, it never really happened, at least not in the way people were led to believe it did.

9pedanterrific
You know, I didn't realize until just now what it was that seemed off about Draco's account of the duel with Grindelwald. He said (quote) "there’s no way two wizards would be so exactly matched that they’d fight for twenty whole hours until one of them fell over from exhaustion", and used this improbability as evidence that the fight had been staged. Fact from canon that I don't believe has been mentioned in MoR (and thus may not be MoR canon): Gur Ryqre Jnaq unf gur negvsnpg-yriry cebcregl bs 'haorngnoyr va pbzong', ohg jvryqref pbhyq or xvyyrq ol, sbe vafgnapr, nffnffvangvat gurz va gurve fyrrc. Speculation: Qhzoyrqber pbhyqa'g npghnyyl qrsrng gur Ryqre Jnaq va n qhry- ur whfg bhgynfgrq vgf jvryqre. It seems obvious in retrospect, but since I didn't think of it until now maybe others haven't either. Unless you have some other reason to think it was faked...?
6ahartell
Malfoy, are you strong enough as a rationalist that you believing that should be strong evidence for us?
0jwhendy
You are in Group B; please post HERE to coordinate with the others in your "virtual meetup."
0jwhendy
Planning discussion thread on g-groups is now HERE

Yeah, it sees some decent use every day.

Cryptonomicon was awesome.

0RobinZ
Ah, of course. :/

It might be a good idea to hold it in Bethesda or some other city in Montgomery County, MD, as there seem to be a lot of LWers from MoCo. (I'm in MoCo as well).

But I'd go to a meetup in DC just the same.

0atucker
Huh. I'm hearing more and more about MoCoers here. Cool. I guess it makes sense though. If nobody speaks up and says they want it in DC, then I'd actually rather have it in Montgomery County. I know Bethesda waaay better than DC.

No, I got an email saying you were sending it, but it wasn't attached.

0Normal_Anomaly
Oops. And now I can't access it from where I am. I'll send it as soon as I get it back.
1Normal_Anomaly
Thanks. Did you or somebody else get my second draft?

Absolutely, I'd love to.

I claimed 'Belief in Belief' and 'Bayesian Judo', see here.

2RobinZ
Added to index. Edit: I'd like to beta for that one - I'll PM you an email address.

I'm glad this is actually happening, and at great speed.
I hereby commit to doing exercises for 'Belief in Belief' and 'Bayesian Judo' by what appears to be our standard commitment: Deliver by April 17, 2011 or downvote to -10

Note: It'll be a combined exercise for those two articles as they're very related.

I propose we make a series of exercises to go along with the articles of the sequences. These exercises could help readers know how well they understood the material as well as help them internalize it better.

2David_Gerard
Now that this is happening, I suggest a post (maybe discussion, maybe main) noting that it is happening and with progress and commitments so far.
3Normal_Anomaly
Would you be willing to beta read my exercise for "Words as Hidden Inferences"? If you say yes I'l email you a word document.
6RobinZ
I propose we create posts in /discussion/ for each post in the sequence containing exercises for that post. I will create a Wiki page now where people can indicate that they have taken charge of creating exercises for any specific post. If I do not edit this comment with a link to said Wiki page within two days, downvote this comment to -10. Edit: Project page. If I do not take charge of creating exercises for at least one page within two days, downvote this comment to -5. Edit: Claimed "Making Beliefs Pay Rent (in Anticipated Experiences)". If I do not submit a page of exercises within two weeks, downvote this comment to -10.

This looks like another of the good ideas people have on here that then doesn't get done. I'm sick of that happening.

If folkTheory creates one exercise as an example, I will make another. I hereby commit to this. If I don't follow through within 2 weeks of folkTheory posting his example, please downvote this comment to negative 10. FolkTheory, please PM me when you have yours so I make sure I see it. Thanks.

Everybody else who wants to see this succeed, feel free to post a similar comment.

EDIT: I'm doing an exercise for Words As Hidden Inferences, and will ... (read more)

2David_Gerard
THIS. THIS. Read parent.
Load More