AI demands unprecedented reliability
My AI pessimism is not addressed by optimistic arguments that do not promise the level of reliability required for a technology that our societies vital functions are expected to rely on. Historically, useful improvements are hard to reverse and solutions can suddenly fail after we had become dependent on them. The potato seemed perfect for Ireland until they all blighted. Dutch dams seemed good, until they broke. Banks seem to keep suddenly failing on the regular. AI is useful and we rely on it. Our culture is under heavy influence of search engines and algorithmic recommendations, people entrust their lives to self-driving cars and companies entrust sensitive or copy-righted data to generative models. AI relies on AI. Some hypothetical ChatGPT call queried Bing which returned a page written by some human who, inspired by a Facebook recommendation, made Bart summarize the report of Covid prediction model that was co-written with Copilot. This low-stakes example fails all the time, but the state of affairs is still useful enough for people to build on top of and thereby increasingly rely upon. The tool-AI future looks like one where man and machine rely on various interdependent models with medical diagnoses, mental help, bureaucracy, military protection, news, matchmaking, electricity supply, medicine production, weather forecasting, forecasting and AI development. The agentic-AI future has us rely on AI to build all of these itself. We should demand a level of reliability that is stricter than any level of reliability our past technologies have achieved because our reliance on AI will be unprecedentedly large. Addendum: unpersuasive arguments I can only guess at what requirements for AI are good enough. Having humanity at AI's mercy and surviving is good enough, but not a situation we'd want to get into without knowing in advance that that is what will happen. In the meantime, here is a list of argument types that should be insufficient for lowering anyone'
Is everyone dropping the ball on cryonics? I'm considering career directions and my P(doom | no pause) is high and my P(doom | I work against X-risk) is close enough to my vanilla P(doom) that I wonder I should pick up this ball instead.