All of Menotim's Comments + Replies

Menotim20

This problem doesn't seem to be about trust at all, it seems to be about incomplete sharing of information. It seems weird to me to say Carla doesn't completely trust Bob's account if she is 100% sure he isn't lying.

The sensitivity of the test - that aliens actually abduct people, given someone is telling her aliens abducted him - is 2.5% since she doesn't really know his drug habits and hasn't ruled out there's a LARP she's missing the context for.

I would describe this not as Carla not trusting Bob, but as her not having all of Bob's information - Bob cou... (read more)

I had the same confusion when I first heard those names. It's called little-endian because "you start with the little end", and the term comes from an analogy to Gulliver

You're mixing up big-endian and little-endian. Big-endian is the notation used in English: twelve is 12 in big-endian and 21 in little-endian. But yes, 123.456 in big-endian would be 654.321 and with a decimal point, you couldn't parse little-endian numbers in the way described by lsusr.

2Ben
You are right. I thought the whole idea with the naming was that the convention whereby "twelve is written 12" the symbol at the end "2" is the one symbolising the littlest bit, so I thought it was called "little endian" for that reason.  I now I have a lot of questions about how the names were chosen (to wikipedia!). It seems really backwards.

Katapayadi does seem to be little endian, but the examples I found on Wikipedia of old Indian numerals and their predecessor, Brahmi numerals, seem to be big-endian.

1fitw
Good point. I didn't know these examples, so my comment is at least partially wrong. I am puzzled about Brahmi numerals: that is supposedly Ashokan Brahmi, but India did not have numerals at the time of Ashoka.