I suspect there has to be a degree of mental disconnect, where they can see that things don't all happen (or not happen) equally as often as each other, but answering the math question of "What's the probability?" feels like a more abstract and different thing.
Maybe mixed up with some reflexive learned helplessness of not really trying to do math because of past experience that's left them thinking they just can't get it.
Possibly over generalising from early textbook probability examples involving coins and dice, where counting up and dividing by the number of possible outcomes is a workable approach.
I know someone who taught math to low-ability kids, and reported finding it difficult to persuade them otherwise. I assume some number of them carried on into adulthood still doing it.
In the infinite limit (or just large-ish x), the probability of at least one success, from nx attempts with 1/x odds on each attempt, will be 1 - ( 1 / e^n )
For x attempts, 1 - 1/e = 0.63212
For 2x attempts 1 - 1/e^2 = 0.86466
For 3x attempts 1 - 1/e^3 = 0.95021
And so on
Ironically, the even more basic error of probabilistic thinking that people so—painfully—commonly make ("It either happens or doesn't, so it's 50/50") would get closer to the right answer.
not intended to be replayed
I have flagrantly disregarded this advice in an attempt to uncover its secrets. I'm assuming there are still a bunch of patterns that remain obscure, but the ones I have picked up on allowed me to end day 60 with 5581 food just now. So I'm calling that good enough.
Rat Ruins:
Starts out rich but becomes depleted after repeat visits
Dragon Lake:
I don't think I've ever seen food here. Dragons not edible?
Goat Grove:
Good at the beginning, gradually runs down as time passes
Horse Hills:
A few random hours of each day (if there's a pattern I haven't spotted it) will return numbers in the 20s or 30s, small numbers otherwise
Tiger Forest:
Good in the last 2 or 3 hours of each day, small numbers otherwise
The rest:
Experimented with spending all day every day in any given territory - some broadly net-positive, some net-negative, but nothing seemed very exciting. Possibly they respond to more complicated conditions that I haven't yet tried
Combined strategy:
Alternate 14 hours in Goat Grove with 2 hours in Tiger Forest as a daily routine. When Goat Grove starts to drop off to single digits per hour (around day 12–14), switch to Horse Hills. At some point hit Rat Ruins for 10 hours or so.
Also, the guy is spamming his post about spamming applications into all the subreddits, which gives the whole thing a great meta twist, I wonder if he’s using AI for that too.
I'm pretty sure I saw what must be the same account, posting blatantly AI generated replies/answers across a ton of different subreddits, including at least some that explicitly disallow that.
Either that or someone else's bot was spamming AI answer comments while also spamming copycat "I applied to 1000 jobs with AI" posts.
Ah, perils of text-only communication and my own mild deficiency in social senses; didn't catch that it was a joke.
Has nonetheless got me thinking about whether some toasted oats would be a good addition to any of the recipes I already like. Lil bit of extra bulk and texture, some browned nutty notes—there's not nothing to that.
Not wishing to be rude but this feels like it's missing a section on the benefits of eating oatmeal sometimes.
There's a favourable comparison to the protein/fibre/arsenic content of white rice, but I don't eat a lot of white rice so I am left unclear on the motivation for substituting something I do eat with oatmeal.
The strategy above makes all three statements seem equally unlikely to be true. Mathematically equivalent but with different emphasis would be to make all three statements seem equally unlikely to be false.
i.e. Pick things that seem so mundane and ordinary that surely they must be universally true—then watch the reaction as it is realised that one of them must actually be a lie.