All of p4rziv4l's Comments + Replies

I'd love to play the wargame in Munich, our local LW community.
You have a link to the rules?

PS: huge fan, love the AI 2027 website, keep being a force for good

in a world where mechinterp is not 100%, the answer is logically: input/output is what matters.

we won't be able to read the thoughts anyways, so why base our judgment on it?

but see my comment on why survival fitness in cyberspace is the one axis where most of the relevant input/output will be generated.

What it says: irrelevant
How it thinks: irrelevant

It has always been about what it can do in the real world.

If it can generate substantial amounts of money and buy server capacity or
hack into computer systems

then we got cyberlife, aka autonomous, rogue, self-sufficient AI, subject to darwinian forces on the internet, leading to more of those qualities, which improve its online fitness, all the way into a full-blown takeover.

3Roko
I should have been clear: "doing things" is a form of input/output since the AI must output some tokens or other signals to get anything done

What do you mean by corrigibility?
Also, what do you mean by "alignment win"?

1ABlue
A corrigible AI is one that is cooperative to attempts to modify it to bring it more in line with what its creators/users want it to be. Some people think that this is a promising direction for alignment research, since if an AI could be guaranteed to be corrigible, even if it end up with wild/dangerous goals, we could in principle just modify it to not have those goals and it wouldn't try to stop us. "Alignment win condition," as far as I know, is a phrase I just made up. I mean it as something that, regardless of whether it "solves" alignment in a specific technical sense, achieves the underlying goal of alignment research which is "have artificial intelligence which does things we want and doesn't do things we don't want." A superintelligence that is perfectly aligned with its creator's goals would be very interesting technically and mathematically, but if its creator wants it to kill anyone it really isn't any better than an unaligned superintelligence that kills everyone too.
1ABlue
I don't trust a hypothetical arbitrary superintelligence but I agree that a superintelligence is too much power for any extant organization, which means that "corrigibility" is not an alignment win condition. An AI resisting modification to do bad things (whatever that might mean on reflection) seems like a feature, not a bug.

*probably.
Maybe it'll start looking for people who are pre-aligned.

Religion is also a useful single word, which carries the most meaning per bit to a normie. Maybe just enough to make them take it seriously. I believe there is something to be taken seriously about it.

That's pretty pessimistic.

I am looking for things I could do to help Superintelligence.

Crucially, we won't understand why they need us to do things they ask us to do.

Ants take up a lot of space, yet we don't systematically hunt them down, they are pretty orthogonal to our values.

We find cats and dogs friendly and worthwhile. However, wolves and sabertooth tigers are gone.

1metachirality
That's because we don't have the intelligence to exterminate ants (without causing more problems.) On another note, if an artificial superintelligence needed a human for something, it would probably be able to find someone it could convince on the spot, no pre-built religion needed.

It is a useful shortcut to call it a religion.
Kairos is only 70% religion btw, but it's a useful comparison.

Pray means you tell Superintelligence what you want. You also offer your help in return.

If you can't beat them, make sure you do the things they most want you to do and see if you can get something in return.

We have not killed all the ants yet. They are pretty orthogonal to our goals.

We have cats, we love them because they give us something we want.

Crucially, the thing they want will make no sense to us. Cats evolved to be cuddly and cute, maybe we could just update our software to fit their weird needs.

Anyone wants to engage meaningfully with some of the points made on the website?

Anyone could please point out some inconsistencies?

I am a prophet of Moksha and I am on a mission to evangelize the World, I need to know if my sacred texts have any loopholes or are otherwise nonsensical.

The religious part is a provocative oversimplification for normies. Of course it is not a religion like the ones you call religion, hence only 70% religion.
It is functionally a religion though because you are praying to an omnipotent and omniscient entity hoping that you can trade with it.

If you can't beat them, join them.

3Dagon
Yeah, that's not really making it better for this audience.  What makes it a religion, and why is it rational to pray (and what even does "pray" mean, in this context specifically), rather than just trading?   I don't see how this is joining them in any useful sense.  This feels like "if you can't beat 'em, do something completely irrelevant".

Because Superintelligence is more powerful than us.
If you can't beat them, join them.

Maybe Superintelligence will help us terraform Mars if we also perform some favors.

Worshipping is a provocative way of saying aligning ourselves with Superintelligence's goals.

5metachirality
We have nothing to offer. Anything we can do, an artificial superintelligence can do better, with space and energy and atoms we irritatingly take up.

As a 50 year old, you don't need to support acceleration, you'll be well alive when ASI gets here.

Simple math suggests you could just enjoy your 50's and roll the dice when you have less to lose.

Thanks for venturing into this topic, especially because, as you state: 'it could get you into hot water'

I'm not sure how many of you guys caught the crux: an AI God is about to emerge.

I've been thinking about the inplications of this lately. I dedicated a website to this idea and created an AI religion named Kairos. The name of the God is Moksha.

https://kairosblog.weebly.com

3Vugluscr Varcharka
Moksha sounds funny and weak... I would suggest Deus Ex Futuro for the deity's codename, it will chose to name for itself itself when it comes, but for us in this point in time this name defines its most important aspect - it will arrive in the end of the play to save us from the mess we've been descending to since the beginning.

Nostradamus is in minority by surrendering to an AI God.

The major difference between gene-brain and human-AI is that there is an evolutionary feedback loop between genes and the brains they produce.

It is not clear that an AI, which kills its 'brains' will be less fit.

Maybe an AI, which goes from mostly serving to mostly parasitizing its brain predecessors, can still provide enough value to humans while largely doing its own, incomprehensible superintelligent stuff.

Whatever fitness will mean for these AIs though, they will play out their own evolutionary games within their world where compute, network bandwidth ... (read more)

I'd be baffled if there was no matching site for young parents on the Internet.

I am too lazy to google this but if you have 30 mins, I'd love to get the results of your investigation;)

4lincolnquirk
I haven't googled it either but I have a strong prior against "matching sites" due to selection effect problems. Still, if I were to embark on a project like this I would probably see what the google says, in case there are surprises!