All of Periergo's Comments + Replies

which literature do you recommend?

The "Less Wrong position"? Are we all supposed to have 1 position here? Or did you mean to ask what EY's position is?

I don't think I understand your statement/question (?) - In order to know what an AI would do, you just need to simulate it with an AI?

I think you're saying that you could simulate what an AGI would do via any computer. If you're simulating an AGI, are you not building an AGI?

So how does a poor summary of Hume = a refutation Solomonoff's induction?

Could I say something like, Alanf wants us to think he refuted a book but he can't even spell the author's name right...

Ok, but what does this have to do with the capital of Italy?

I am new to this stuff but did we not have like 200 years of observations about Newton's theories? How would have a Bayesian adjusted their models here? I use this example as a "we now know better" - Is it the "new" observation that is key?

Where can I learn more about Critical Rationalism?


(Not from curi and his group as I am not welcomed there and tbh after seeing this wall of shame: http://curi.us/2215-list-of-fallible-ideas-evaders I am glad I never posted any personal information)

4mako yass
A lot of people seemed to like Beginning of Infinity.

Try searching "parsimony" maybe? Another way to express Occam.

I just discovered he keeps a wall of shame for people who left his forum:

http://curi.us/2215-list-of-fallible-ideas-evaders

Are you in this wall?

I am uncomfortable with this practice. I think I am banned from participating in curi's forum now anyway due to my comments here so it doesn't affect me personally but it is a little strange to have this list with people's personal information up.

She's just not a philosopher.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with a ton of her observations. As much as I agree with a ton of Buddhism. It is just not Philosophy.

3Luke Allen
Let's get our ontology correct. She used philosophical tools to approach philosophical problems, and wrote essays on the results in philosophical terminology. That makes her a philosopher. If her results were incorrect, at worst she's an incorrect philosopher like so many others throughout history who moved philosophy into "less wrong" territory. The same is true of Buddhism, and Christianity too: in addition to being religions, they're philosophies, making ontological and ethical statements and explaining how those were reached. And atheism, while a philosophical viewpoint, also has had religious social structures built around it, such as taboos against self-coding as religious. Exploring the philosophical "realm" and "mining" new seams of gold ore (or fools' gold) is what makes one a philosopher, whether one comes in with a pickaxe and mule like the '49'ers or a bulldozer and dynamite like the industrial strip-miners.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/LYGLPwwBtNH28qPud/open-letter-to-miri-tons-of-interesting-discussion?commentId=Cx8DBK6RqqqnMwAYa


The duplicates you got banned for here no? It seems self evident, but I don't hold anything against you for that.

fallibledupicates or w/e.

1curi
I have never sock puppeted at LW and I have never been banned at the LW website. You're just wrong and smearing me. Please leave me alone.

I think he seems to struggle with unwritten knowledge/rules. (likely on the spectrum?)

So I think his methodology is a way for him to keep track of things in a way that makes sense to him.

I am convinced he is doing it in good faith and genuinely wants to learn and discuss these things in a very serious manner. I think this is what Wittgenstein had in mind when he said if a Lion could speak we could not understand him.

I think curi has an interesting brain. He seems extremely quick with one side of his brain and can read vasts amounts of information very qu... (read more)

2curi
What sock puppets?

Damn. Just realized I was looking to follow someone as a disciple, without thinking in those terms.

Oh brother...I am a sheep after all. What a mess. I do want to learn from curi though, but I hate the idea of being someone's disciple.

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply

I wish we could reason our way into being focused. This was a great post btw don't get me wrong, but we seem to still resort to the proverbial putting the cookie jar at the very top so it is hard to reach.

I see now that I completely misunderstood you and was careless and did not think my response carefully. I apologize, this was lazy of me and I should do better.

I think this one might be reaching a bit. This version of energy conservation by "pick up artists" seems more off track than something in behavioral economics might present.

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
1curi
Saying something "seems more off track" is not an argument criticizing some error in it.