What qualities does an AGI need to have to realize the risk of false vacuum, without hardcoding physics theories into it?
For this question, let's assume the worst about the universe: 1. That a false vacuum decay can be created, 2. False vacuum decay will destroy the universe, i. e. inside the true vacuum bubble life/computation will be impossible. 3. Faster-than-light travel is impossible, i. e. it's not possible to outrun...
While I think the scenario I described is very unlikely, it nonetheless remains a possibility.
More specifically - that there might be a simpler theory of physics that explains all "naturally" occurring conditions (in a contemporary particle accelerator, in a black hole, quasar, supernova, etc.), but doesn't predict the possibility of false vacuum in some unnatural conditions that may be created by AGI, while a more complicated theory of physics does.
If AGI prefers a simpler theory, that may cause it to create a false vacuum decay.