All of Scott Broock's Comments + Replies

Nicely done. I have strong upvoted. I still understand why this forum would, on aggregate, downvote it, and I think it's right to not be far above zero; it's good intuitionbuilding for a post that could be upvoted, which is intuitively related to why I felt the urge to comment in a way that was not entirely negative. but I don't think my read of this article's contribution to those models is that they're high quality per word. it seems like it has some amount of linkedin's memetic antipatterns - the tug towards apparent legitimacy that can be upvoted on a particular kind of legitimacy-seeking context but where strong epistemics is not demanded. Jungian psychology seems like a solid pretheoretic understanding of some concepts, but they can become formal as they become legible to us when our conceptual vision improves, and much of what jung studied already has passed into the realm of being within reach for firmer formalisms. the collective unconscious is a living machine, just as every individual and neuron and protein within it is. language models bring us somewhat closer to true collective consciousness, in the sense of dynamical feedback that allows all components to contribute; but we've been floating around in the general realm of that for a while via memes, and much of what pushes us away is individual caution about various incentive compatibilities between souls. individual free will and autonomy must be maintained clearly for connection to collective free will to be accepted by any part of earth, and only by doing so can collective free will occur in the first place, because free will occurs at the edge of criticality, the point between chaos and order where the most new knowledge can be created. right now the risk balance network has so many souls at risk from imbalances of will, where there are people in parts of the collective mind that other parts have "forgotten" about due to armwrestle. As AI strengthens, more of those in these weakest parts of the net