All of zerker2000's Comments + Replies

To be clear, are we talking about non-disclosure agreements, or non-*disparagement* agreements?

7jefftk
The latter, often coupled with the former to prevent disclosure of the existence of the agreement.

I would say they are, in the worst instances a kind of sazen, and in the best instances recognizably enough jargon that they dodge the illusion of transparency being double. Similarly, the word "sazen" is not centrally sazen, because nobody's going to look at it and go "oh I think I know what that means".

1Jasnah Kholin
I was sazened by the word Sazen when i saw Duncan use it on facebook, and though i understood it. to my defense i say that now i believe this word does not carve reality at the joints, and that folk wisdom and what-sazen-should-mean are two different, distinct things. 

Alternate theory for what FOG means: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Support_Activity#Field_Operations_Group

Given I'm not sure why you'd put a gyroscope on a gun, we're not that high tech.

2jimmy
  Nothing is fielded yet, but it's definitely in development. Gyros allow for the motion to be measured, which allows it to be corrected.
2lsusr
Thanks. I have removed the bracketed annotation in question.

The explicit argument I would make here is, the post makes some reference to the author being Buddhist, and therefore less likely to say things they can't verify. Or even things believed true that would cause drama. And then elaborates that the post will do both these things anyway, because there is a "conflict of interest" between speaking divisively against Aella, and speaking(?) divisively against those Jōshin seeks to warn away.

It is my understanding that whatever value one assigns to whisper networks, cancellations, and so on, "devout buddhist" is a s... (read more)

I am an interested party ^-^

Think carefully about what this advice is trying to imply.

Using NLP-style nested loops, i.e. performing what is basically a stack overflow on the brain's frame-of-reference counter? Wicked.

I find myself wondering how many of the tactics can be derived from Umineko, which I know Tuxedage has played fairly recently.

1Baughn
Interesting, I hadn't considered that idea. Still, I don't.. think that's it...

Except we're not allowed to use anyone else's source code, so the test could just as easily be simplified to "if opponent source contains integer 1415926535, cooperate"(for a randomly chosen 1415926535).

0satt
Agreed, although I don't know how impractical or unknown it was in 2000 — I remember playing with GranuLab on my home PC around 2001.

I am not sure how much evidence there is for Extreme Programming. But if it works, I wonder how much its rules can be translated to areas beyond programming. (Or maybe it already exists. Maybe "two minds work better than one" was already know for millenia, only for IT people it remains a surprising and controversial topic.) Could we somehow abstract the coding details away, and call it Extreme Doing?

It's controverisal, and application to other industries more so, but efforts to target some of the low-hanging fruit are underway.

Woo has been renamed to pitches, noting for posterity. Easy enough to google; then again so is gur onfvyvfx yet everyone treats it as a big secret.

And this is why we (barely) have checkpointing. If you close you web browser, and launch a saved copy from five minutes ago, is the session a different one?

This in turn reminds me of a wonderful platformer, Company of Myself

Return a "divide by zero"-type error, or send your Turing machine up in smoke trying.

It has been deleted to prevent edit war.