All of zntneo's Comments + Replies

zntneo00

Here is a study that says it predicts criminal recidivism. This study says its predicts substance abuse.

zntneo10

You might also get diagnosed with things out of the blue. I have dealt with depression MST of my life and one Dr tried to say I had psychosis. I am pretty sure he was wrong.

zntneo10

So I recently found out I have ADHD inattentive type. I think that is a cause of my current unemployment. I have been trying to say about ways to compensate that are science-based but having a hard time finding good information (I am on a medication now). Any suggestions would help.

zntneo140

I donated a small amount

zntneo30

I have been trying to find ways to compensate for some of the worse problems of my low conscientiousness. I tend to not be thorough when it comes to things I do (for instance checking spelling before posting comments,checking to see if I made a mistake in a project I am working on, making sure I pay attention to detail). I really haven't found anything worth noting so any help would be appreciated. (The seriousness of this is I am close to being fired for it and fear I wont be able to compensate well enough)

(I realize I cant change my conscientiousness sco... (read more)

zntneo00

"Emotions Revealed" has a test in the back and is recommends to read along with doing the training (I am currently reading it)

zntneo00

i find that heuristic to be silly. Pesticides that are used in conventional farming are heavily regulated unlike ones used in organic foods.

zntneo00

Most of it is safe from my reading and it saves a ton of people

3RomeoStevens
Right, I'm familiar with the latter portion. But this isn't a question about what is optimal on a large scale, only what is optimal for me eat. "Most of it" is worrying.
zntneo00

I am terrible at commingled up with ideas for goals I want(meaning I cant think of any goals) How might I use these techniques for that

zntneo00

Do you notice yourself ever wanting to scream at people to be specific? Also, screaming at people on the Tv to be more specifi happens a lot. I wont even mention listening to politicians......

0[anonymous]
Ha ha. Not really. It's more like "ugh, unspecific". ... this is the 21st century, right? also, internet fist-bump for a fellow minicamper.
zntneo30

Do you think an intro to CBT would be useful at a minicamp? It seems to me rationality applied to ones own thoughts about oneself (something that i am extremely irrational about)

2Mercurial
Possibly! We considered it before but decided against it for a number of reasons. One was that CBT is its own thing, and none of us are formally trained in its use or in teaching it. Another is the unfortunate context of it being therapy, which tends to turn a lot of people off. However, the latter effect didn't seem to be relevant this last minicamp. That has caused me to update in favor of at least suggesting an overview of the process. And I think I'd be quite comfortable providing an overview. So we might bring it up - but I'd guess only in the July camp due to time considerations, if at all.
zntneo00

I have seen a lot of people suggest remember the milk. Can someone explain why that one compared to others like Toodledoo?

0Davorak
I tried entering "Check weather tomorrow" into Toodledoo and it did not automatically set a due date of tomorrow. I spend ~2 minutes and I found out how to turn on keyboard shortcuts but did not find the page explaining them, it was under a minute for both in RTM. May keyboard short cuts overlapped with gmail and or unix environments in RTM which made them easy to pick up. I am sure you can find more complete comparisons elsewhere and I was not aware of Toodledoo until your post so it is probably not an evenhanded review on my part.
zntneo130

Hey I'm Zach, So today, using Critich's idea for associative memory. I went to the cupboard 5 times pulled out my phone and did a little dance. This is to help get me in the habit of calorie counting.

Oh and i told a few people about this but i'll share this too. I have always hated fashion with a passion (i did not mean the rhyme). I found out what i actually hate is "mainstream fashion." For those at the fashion session watching luke's part of the presentation left me with a "well crap i have to look like that in order to be "fashionable" " feeling, it was a dreadful feeling. Reflecting on it and talking to Rick more i found out that i actually like more around what Colin was wearing.

2Alexei
Hey, Zach. I share your "hate" (although, it's not really a very strong emotion for me) for mainstream fashion. I think if your lifestyle allows you to avoid that, then you certainly can. (I work in the game industry, so I'm free to wear almost anything.) Do look into alternative fashion. Look at things you like. Check out interesting websites like etsy for items that are pretty awesome and might give you interesting ideas. Look at different subcultures and steal from them.
zntneo00

got a degree in psychology and a couple credits short of a minor in philosophy. I had a poor gpa due mostly to the fact that i started as a computer engineer and have some learning disabilities that i didn't realize then. I want to be able do something with my psych degree such as go to grad school to do research in psych but have no idea if i can make it. Also, currently i am a cashier who is looking for a tech job (i have an associates in information technology and 6 years of part time experience) but i can't seem to get one. Any help would be appreciated, I could use help both in figuring out what i want to do, how to conduct a job search and many other things.

zntneo00

What about a 3 way partnership for the anti-akrasia. I suffer from a massive amount of akrasia. And need desparently to get a better job (i have a BS in psychology and an associates in information technology with 6 years experience in the field yet i work as a cashier which is driving me insane)

0magfrump
So far this has not happened. If you'd like to try to figure something out please private message me with some more personal info. I'm not sure what the most effective way to do things would be, but I feel like having a nemesis who you skype with once a week or so and attempt to embarrass with your achievements and who laughs at your failures would be fun and motivating (assuming it was in good spirits and followed with constructive conversation)
zntneo20

I got a degree in psychology and a couple credits short of a minor in philosophy. I had a poor gpa due mostly to the fact that i started as a computer engineer and have some learning disabilities that i didn't realize then. I want to be able do something with my psych degree such as go to grad school to do research in psych but have no idea if i can make it. Also, currently i am a cashier who is looking for a tech job (i have an associates in information technology and 6 years of part time experience) but i can't seem to get one. Any help would be appricated

zntneo00

So are you a professor? I got a degree in psychology and a couple credits short of a minor in philosophy. I had a poor gpa due mostly to the fact that i started as a computer engineer and have some learning disabilities that i didn't realize then. I want to be able do something with my psych degree such as go to grad school to do research in psych but have no idea if i can make it. Also, currently i am a cashier who is looking for a tech job (i have an associates in information technology and 6 years of part time experience) but i can't seem to get one. Any help would be appreciated

zntneo00

After reading and taking classes in judgement i really am curious why we put any stock in eyewitness testimony. The only thing i can thing of is that it might be the only type of evidence in a trial but should that be suffienct to convict someone?

zntneo00

I am curious is there any RCTs on the effectiveness of these enzymes?

zntneo20

Have you tried using implementation intentions they seem like they have good research backing. See this , and this

zntneo30

I totally agree if its not your cup of tea fine. What pisses me off is the line about " if you don't believe it exists it seems like a good reason to not be concerned with it"

zntneo00

This is why we do population studies and don't rely on anecdotes because we cant be sure otherwise if the cause is due to a vaccine or randomness.

zntneo00

Well yes that context matters which is why I wondered how he new the reaction was due to the vaccine

zntneo40

I would say that for instance I don't believe that most alt med stuff works but this is exactly the reason I care that others know this and how we know this. This attitude infuriates me.

6machrider
The fact is that there are many battles worth fighting, and strong skeptics are fighting one (or perhaps a few) of them. (As I was disgusted to see recently, human sacrifice apparently still happens.) However, I also think it's ok to say that battle is not the one that interests you. You don't have the capacity to be a champion for all possible good causes, so it's good that there is diversity of interest among people trying to improve the human condition.
zntneo-10

I have had the flu vaccine regulary for the past 5 years and have never had an adverse reaction. Further how are you sure the "reactions" you are having are from the vaccine?

0byrnema
Sometimes it is clear that the reaction is from the vaccine, for example, if you arm is sore at the location of the flu shot injection of if you get dizzy and need to sit for 20 minutes in the doctor's office with monitoring. Other times it is less clear, possible reactions have to be taken in the context of how likely they are to occur randomly and how temporally linked they are to the shot. (For example, I wouldn't believe flu-like symptoms occurring a few weeks later is due to the shot.)
zntneo00

I still can't get over how much MBTI seems to work on the foyer effect.

zntneo00

Holy crap i'll edit hold on

zntneo00

I think the experimental evidence for religion making people happier is horribly flawed (i might be a bit biased given i worked in a lab who was doing work on the subject). Here are some reasons:

Generally the researchers in the field assume that you can just do a linear analysis of religiosity and happiness, meaning using a scale of not religious to very religious and then making not religious=atheist, which is clearly not a good assumption. In fact studies have shown in the past a curvilinear relationship where the "more certain" positions of ... (read more)

0pedanterrific
Happy? Religiosity? You lost me. More punctuation, maybe?
zntneo00

Ok i've read all the comments and have no idea what everyone is talking about and how to rationally go about making a guess. Could someone post a link or something that might explain?

zntneo10

Well he does have other arguments such as the evolutionary argument against naturalism but generally he is considered one of the more rigorous of christian philosophers.

oh and btw yea the basic belief argument seems absolutely horrible to me.

zntneo-10

I would have picked something by william lane craig,richard swinburne or alvin plantinga. I mean mere christanity if i remember right is the book where he brings up the triliema argument for the jesus being god.

[anonymous]141

Lewis doesn't argue that the trilemma proves Jesus was God - he uses it to dismiss the wishy-washy agnostic position of "Well, Jesus was a great moral teacher, and worthy of respect, so whether he was God or not doesn't matter."

Lewis' position is "No, hang on a minute, this is someone who's spouting moral platitudes that everyone already agrees with, not anything new as far as the morals go. But he's also claiming to be God - he's saying, over and over again, that he is God. That leaves only three options, really - either he's actually God, or he's a liar, or he's deluded. Whatever he was, he wasn't an exceptionally decent human being, so get off the fence."

3[anonymous]
Perhaps it's my own philosophical upbringing coming to rear its ugly head, but Plantinga is practically worthless as a true defense of Christianity. "Basic beliefs" in particular are such an obviously nasty hack, and the resulting epistemological relativism is frightening to behold.
zntneo10

hmm... god delusion generally wouldn't be at the top for "best arguments" for atheism. I'd go with something like the Atheism: the case against god or if he'll read a tome you have Atheism:a philosophical justification, the impossibility of god, the improbability of god. These are all pretty high level philosophy books but they are the best and strongest books out there. Did your friend really recommend mere Christianity for best argument on his side?

0Morendil
Yeah. Then again that was probably "best" in the same sense that TGD was "best" for me: what came to mind on the spot. He's probably read a bunch of other books (and obviously, the Bible), MC was his answer to "which work is most likely to get an open-minded atheist to take one step in my direction". In fact there were plenty of things in Mere Christianity that I agreed with, it just didn't make much of an impression on me as an argument for the existence of God. It boils down to "we have a strong intuition that there is an objective morality, therefore God". (ETA: now that I think of it, though, he may have recommended the book also as an answer to the question "what is it exactly that you believe in". Looking back, there may have been some ambiguity to our agreement.)
-1zntneo
I would have picked something by william lane craig,richard swinburne or alvin plantinga. I mean mere christanity if i remember right is the book where he brings up the triliema argument for the jesus being god.
zntneo00

Dang i missed the meeting if anyone wants to add me i'm here https://plus.google.com/101382871104606212529/posts

1wedrifid
Why would anyone want to add you? Hint: I'm inviting you to say something like "Hi, I'm an aspiring rationalist from X. I want to meetup with other smart folks and you should want to meetup with me to because I'm awesome." Then I can welcome you to lesswrong and I'll have something to associate to when I see zntneo comments!
zntneo00
  • Well i'm still trying to find a better job. I am thinking i need a better job search method. Any suggestions on a good method of job search would be great
  • Working on getting my self to actually do things instead of sleep as much as i do.
  • Reading a book by susan blackmore about consciousness *Just finished a book called "Philosophy Toolbox"
zntneo-10

close its a gas station unfortunately makes it even slower

zntneo-20

Not assuming that i should work on exercises its that i want to.

zntneo10

Yes when nobody is at the register. I know its a great opportunity for improvement in social skills and in fact have noticed an improvement (though i have also noticed some things i find very annoying about some social conventions)

8Raemon
I was a cashier for a while with a shift that went from 5 PM to 11 PM, which took from "super busy" to almost dead. I used the late night time dead zones to work on writing projects. I don't know that I ever did anything all that productive with the few minutes of downtime you periodically got in busier sections. I don't have recommendations for mental exercises. Are there mental exercises that you normally do, or are you assuming that mental exercises are valuable things you should be working on, and this seemed like a good place to do it? My belief is that 90% of the rationality that's worth learning is done by doing stuff, not thinking about stuff. (Or rather, thinking about stuff while you're doing it). There's plenty I find annoying about social conventions, but I actually took the opportunity at the register to practice subverting them for comedic effect[1]. Learning when and how to skirt social rules is a valuable (and fun) skill. Although in truth, you should probably self-modify to treat social conventions like a game with interesting rules to learn - you're going to have to adapt to them one way or another. A lot of the time you can get away with subverting them if you project confidence and understand the meta-rules that led to them in the first place. But another lot of the time, you really, really need to be following the regular scripts or you're going to be shooting yourself in the foot and no amount of complaining about the irrationality of the world is going to help you. [1] Comedy in particular is a valuable skill and the checkout line is a great place to practice it.
zntneo00

His definition of rationality is still quite annoying.

zntneo30

As someone who is both into the skeptics movement and the atheist movement i'm not sure what skeptics "wouldn't dare mutter" about. It seems to me that skeptics and atheists just have and interest in those things and want to stop the harm caused by them.

Also, i must be ignorant about all these other horrible delusions you are talking about.

Further you must be talking about instrumental rationality because i'm not sure how this is evidence against epistemic rationality.

4Vladimir_M
I may have been too harsh on the skeptics, some of whom occasionally do attack nonsense in a way that riles up not just crackpots, but also some highly respectable and even academically accredited ideologues and charlatans. However, the problem I see is the main thrust of the movement, which assumes that dangerous nonsense that should be attacked and debunked is practically always purveyed and followed by people outside the official, respectable, accredited mainstream, with the implicit assumption that the latter is maybe imperfect, but still without any deep and horrendous flaws, and in matters where it produces strong consensus, we have nothing much to worry about. This is where my Titanic analogy comes in. When I read about skeptics debunking people like, say, Uri Geller or Erich von Daeniken, clearly I have no objection to the substance of their work -- on the contrary. However, if such people are left unchecked, it's not like they will tomorrow be awarded high places in the government and the academia, and be given the power to propagandize their views with high official authority, both in classrooms and in mass media that would cite them as authorities, to write laws and regulations based on their delusions, to promote (and aggressively impose) their views through international institutions and foreign policy, etc., etc., with all the disastrous consequences that may follow from that. Therefore, shouldn't a rational person be more concerned with the possible delusions of people who do have such power and authority? They are the ones presently in charge of steering the ship, after all, and it's not like there aren't any icebergs around. Of course, if you believe that the official institutions that produce academic consensus and respectable mainstream public opinion are generally OK and not causing any ongoing (or potential future) disasters, clearly these concerns are baseless. But are you really so sure that this optimism is based on a realistic appraisal of
1Eugine_Nier
As I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, I recommend this post by Quirinus_Quirrell. The list there is by no means comprehensive, but it should give you an idea of what people are talking about. Edit: Two more good articles to read are this one by Paul Graham, and this post by Vladimir_M.
zntneo00

I think I can relate quite a bit. It is absolutely infuriating when someone does anyone care to try to be rational. I am always having to explain to people why I care about what is true. The question to me has become like nails on a chalkboard. the thing that has helped me mildly is that most people do not have any education on what it means to be rational. they they have not even been introduced to the concept ( other than Hollywood rationality which is almost as irritating). I also remember that at one time I was kind of like them which makes it so that I tend to educate them about it (although I think I am as a teacher/mentor).

zntneo00

No these are bus drivers and random people on the bus.

zntneo00

Seems close. I don't see why it couldn't be just one person randomly selected.

zntneo00

I don't lurk there but my wife spends lots of time at BB. Almost everyone at bb.com think 4HB is a joke. I also agree with the playing with things but there needs to be boundaries and imho 4HB falls outside of what i would consider scientifically reasonable.

zntneo00

I must say that given that i choose to have my last name be aletheia i so prefer the aletheia based ones :)

zntneo00

Yea make me even more jealous i wasn't chosen to go :P

zntneo00

I am someone who generally throws a pair of whatever seems will be appropriate for the weather (pants or shorts) and a random t-shirt on. I am not even sure if i match most of the time. I have a beard which is quite uncommon for men in our society(which to me is mildly sad)

zntneo00

I am someone who generally throws a pair of whatever seems will be appropriate for the weather (pants or shorts) and a random t-shirt on. I am not even sure if i match most of the time. I have a beard which is quite umcommon for men in our society(which to me is mildly sad)

0AdeleneDawner
Are the t-shirts plain, or do they have designs (text, images) on them? What are the designs? Do they signal affiliation in any way? What's your usual context?
zntneo00

I am pretty sure it is clearly a recommendation.

zntneo00

I've been looking for a book that had to do with moral psychology. I read Moral Minds a while ago but much of that is now suspect in my mind because of the controversy surrounding the author. I'll have to add it to much collection at some point.

zntneo40

This is one of the posts that i wish everyone in the skeptical community would read.

Load More