Drahflow comments on Absolute denial for atheists - Less Wrong

39 Post author: taw 16 July 2009 03:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (571)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Drahflow 17 July 2009 12:50:10AM 18 points [-]

You are not living as much on the edge as you should optimally.

I estimate that most LW Readers are relatively young (i.e. < 40y old). The repair mechanism of your bodies can deal with a lot more than they currently have to handle. To increase your effectiveness multiple routes exist:

  • move faster, run instead of walk
  • employ polyphasic sleep
  • take more stimulants
Comment author: cousin_it 17 July 2009 09:51:53AM 11 points [-]

This reminded me of Umeshisms: "If you’ve never missed a flight, you’re spending too much time in airports."

Comment author: [deleted] 17 July 2009 01:07:37AM 4 points [-]

Regarding polyphasic sleep: if you're under, say, 18, don't. The effects it has on the body's developmental processes are not known.

Comment author: thomblake 17 July 2009 03:05:47PM 1 point [-]

I see no reason for someone to take this advice. Polyphasic sleep has been the norm in many cultures and periods of history, and one might be more inclined to advise, "Regarding monophasic sleep: if you're under, say, 18, don't. The effects it has on the body's developmental processes are not known"

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 July 2009 03:44:40PM *  2 points [-]

Polyphasic sleep has been the norm in many cultures and periods of history

I have not heard this before, even on web sites touting it. Reference? A quick Google only turned up sceptical comments, and "segmented sleep", which isn't what I've understood by "polyphasic sleep".

Comment author: thomblake 17 July 2009 03:48:00PM *  0 points [-]

Well I don't have a reference handy, but the page you just linked to identified "segmented sleep" as a synonym for "polyphasic sleep". It seems to be along the lines I was thinking.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 July 2009 07:46:14PM *  0 points [-]

What I understood by polyphasic sleep is the practice of "ultra-short napping to achieve more time awake each day", the point being to get more productive hours per day. There's no suggestion that segmented sleep involves sleeping fewer hours than normal, but it might increase the quality of the waking hours.

From La Wik on segmented sleep: "Peasant couples were often too tired after a long day's work to do much more than eat and go to sleep". I sometimes have days like that, whereupon I'm likely to wake once or more through the night. Maybe I should get up and meditate or something, instead of turning over and falling asleep again.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 July 2009 03:44:40PM 2 points [-]

Well, yes; biphasic sleep (noon siesta) is the natural sleeping pattern beyond infanthood. For extreme schedules like Uberman's, though, there have been lots of reports on odd cravings and the like — such as grape juice — that, e.g. contain elements the body would normally generate itself during sleep.

(Are you really saying that we don't know the effects of monophasic sleep?)

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 17 July 2009 06:34:29PM 2 points [-]

Yes, we really don't know the effects of monophasic sleep compared to polyphasic sleep.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 July 2009 10:50:31PM 0 points [-]

I don't understand how that makes sense in context of your original comment.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 18 July 2009 12:42:44AM 0 points [-]

I only made one comment; saying "yes" probably suggested more coherence with Thom Blake than there really was.

My complaint is naturalistic fallacy.

Comment author: thomblake 17 July 2009 06:36:26PM 0 points [-]

Erm, yeah, what Douglas_Knight said.

Comment author: CannibalSmith 17 July 2009 12:30:03PM 1 point [-]

physically maybe but with all the distractions dramas and bad language on the internets im overloaded to the point of periodic anxiety and depression