MrHen comments on Open Thread: February 2010 - Less Wrong

1 Post author: wedrifid 01 February 2010 06:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (738)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: MrHen 09 February 2010 07:49:24PM 2 points [-]

What is the correct term for the following distinction:

Scenario A: The fair coin has 50% chance to land heads.
Scenario B: The unfair coin has an unknown chance to land heads, so I assign it a 50% chance to get heads until I get more information.

If A flips up heads it won't change the 50%. If B flips up heads it will change the 50%. This makes Scenario A more [something] than Scenario B, but I don't know the right term.

Comment author: Rain 11 February 2010 07:01:26PM *  1 point [-]

Static? Unchanging? Complete (as far as definitions of the situation go)? Simple (as far as equations go - it lacks the dynamic variable representing the need to update)?

Comment author: MrHen 11 February 2010 07:27:51PM 1 point [-]

Thank you for responding! I was wondering if anyone ever would.

The best I could come up with was "Fixed" or "Confident." Your choices seem on par with those. Perhaps there is no technical term for this? I find that hard to believe.


Changing the original question slightly seems to be looking for a different but similar term:

Unfair coin A has been flipped 10^6 times and appears to be diverging on 60% in favor of HEADS
Unfair coin B has been flipped 10^1 times and appears to be diverging on 60% in favor of HEADS

If I flip coin A and it results in HEADS the estimation of 60% will move less than it would if I was flipping coin B. This makes coin A more [something] than coin B, but I don't know the right term.

Comment author: Rain 11 February 2010 07:38:10PM *  1 point [-]

More defined. You've reduced your uncertainty about its properties (unfairness) using more evidence.

I'm sorry, I avoid technical terms when thinking about such things.

Comment author: MrHen 11 February 2010 07:38:59PM 0 points [-]

Ah! That works wonderfully!

Comment author: thomblake 11 February 2010 07:36:10PM 1 point [-]

This makes coin A more [something] than coin B

I'm pretty sure it makes your beliefs about coin A more [something] than coin B.

Comment author: MrHen 11 February 2010 07:39:31PM 0 points [-]

Okay, sure, I can deal with that. But I still need something to put in for [something]. :)

Comment author: thomblake 11 February 2010 07:41:49PM 0 points [-]

Left as an exercise for the reader.

Comment author: MrHen 11 February 2010 07:47:46PM 0 points [-]

Hey! That doesn't help...

Though, honestly, I am just looking for a word; a term that describes the behavior. I don't need the behavior explained.

Comment author: Cyan 11 February 2010 07:54:26PM 1 point [-]

It makes your beliefs about coin A more concentrated than your beliefs about coin B.

Comment author: MrHen 11 February 2010 08:00:11PM 0 points [-]

Yes! That feels like the term I was looking for, thanks.