randallsquared comments on A survey of anti-cryonics writing - Less Wrong

75 Post author: ciphergoth 07 February 2010 11:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (310)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: randallsquared 09 February 2010 04:39:16PM 2 points [-]

Because the less evidence there is, the better the chance that we're mistaken about it, all else equal. But this seems obvious enough that I guess I'm missing your point.

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 February 2010 10:34:56PM 1 point [-]

Sure, the weaker the evidence, the less you'll be misled on average by ignoring it. But there doesn't come a point where ignoring evidence is not misleading at all compared to updating on it. It's never going to be a good idea to start saying to yourself "that's only a little bit of evidence, so I'll just pretend it wasn't there".

Comment author: randallsquared 10 February 2010 02:17:24AM 2 points [-]

If updating were costless, I'd agree.