Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Boo lights: groupthink edition - Less Wrong

17 Post author: Morendil 15 February 2010 06:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 17 February 2010 01:46:58AM 1 point [-]

Why was this voted up to +4? Y'all are way too scared of being labeled cultish if you're voting this stuff up.

I really wish there was some way to teach arrogance. It seems to be such a large factor in whether people actually make progress as rationalists or not.

Comment author: Morendil 17 February 2010 08:55:53AM 3 points [-]

I really wish there was some way to teach arrogance.

Just keep modeling. ;)

Comment author: Jack 17 February 2010 01:52:02AM 4 points [-]

I liked the suggestions. I wouldn't permanently ban any topics but if every couple of months we stopped talking about transhumanist topics I think the results would be really constructive and help grow the community.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 February 2010 03:24:31AM *  2 points [-]

I really wish there was some way to teach arrogance. It seems to be such a large factor in whether people actually make progress as rationalists or not.

I don't usually find cause to say this in reply to downvoted comments, but that is worth a post. Particularly because the conception you have of arrogance (or at least, the conceptions that I infer you have about arrogance) crosses some significant inferential barriers so is lost somewhat in this context.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 17 February 2010 03:44:11AM *  3 points [-]

I think The Proper Use of Humility, The Proper Use of Doubt, Science Doesn't Trust Your Rationality, and Einstein's Superpowers contain most of the essential ideas, which isn't to say that a post amplifying the point wouldn't be useful.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 February 2010 04:50:49AM 0 points [-]

I agree on both counts, and thanks for rounding up the links. Somewhere in my collection of half-baked drafts is a post specific to arrogance itself, how the definition is tied to status, when it is useful and when it isn't.

Comment author: D_Alex 17 February 2010 08:18:40AM 4 points [-]

Why was this not downvoted to -10? Y'all are way too cultish if you are not voting this stuff down.

I really wish there was some way to teach irony. It seems to be such a large factor in whether people actually make progress as rationalists or not.

Comment author: rortian 17 February 2010 02:14:56AM -2 points [-]

One symptom from the linked definition of groupthink:

Exercising direct pressure on others

Seriously though man, you're the one that has the overwhelming karma lead around here. Seems a little petty to police 4 dissenting votes.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 17 February 2010 03:34:41AM 3 points [-]

Karma isn't the point.