Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Undiscriminating Skepticism - Less Wrong

97 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 14 March 2010 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1329)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CronoDAS 15 March 2010 08:37:47PM 4 points [-]

Consuming human meat is generally disapproved of...

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 March 2010 09:49:43PM 10 points [-]

If you uploaded, would you be willing to let someone else eat your body if they were, y'know, into that sort of thing?

Comment author: Jordan 17 March 2010 03:03:38AM 12 points [-]

If you wanted to kill yourself you could satisfy the desires of quite a few fringe people at once: have a psychopath kill you, a necrophiliac rape you, and a cannibal eat you. Hell, if done under the right medical supervision it might even be possible to save the organs too (of course, if I were a cannibal I'd probably be bummed out if I didn't get any liver).

Comment author: RobinZ 17 March 2010 01:21:55PM 4 points [-]

Wait, is it rape if you give pre-mortem consent?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 17 March 2010 08:02:28AM 9 points [-]

I am constantly amazed by the number of people who commit suicide without getting on the evening news.

Comment author: Strange7 18 April 2011 03:59:36PM 4 points [-]

I've heard that many deaths ruled suicide might be better classified as signaling botches. That is, the individual in question was doing something with the lowest available probability of actually killing them, which would still be recognized as a suicide attempt and thereby provoke reassurances. A multifetish scenario would be far enough outside societal norms to be unlikely to attract support, and virtually impossible to survive.

In other cases, it's a matter of extreme altruism, not wanting to be a burden on others. That's more compatible with the psychopath/necrophile/cannibal option, but, statistically speaking, so few people empathize with any of those demographics (let alone all three) that they aren't common targets for even minor altruism, let alone literal self-sacrifice.

Comment author: wnoise 17 March 2010 05:54:11AM 1 point [-]

Liver grows back far more readily than any other organ. It might be possible to give the cannibal a slice and still use the rest. Of course, given the shortages of livers, it would probably be better to split it and graft into multiple people.

Comment author: Kevin 15 March 2010 10:28:57PM 1 point [-]

Depends on my current state of wealth and the current meaning of "wealth" in the universe. I think if I uploaded I'd still prefer to be frozen/vitrified (or whatever the current state of the art with regards to that is), just in case I ever changed my mind. Also, I hold a bit of sentimental value towards my body, and if I could afford to keep it well preserved for an extremely long time, why not?

If, say, I could only afford to upload if I let someone eat my body and that paid better than medical research or donating my organs, sure, a cannibalism fetishist or super-hardcore foodie could eat my body.

Comment author: FAWS 15 March 2010 09:54:00PM 1 point [-]

Eat your simulated body while you are in it (presumably with pain turned off or at least down?) or your original body (which you don't have any use for anymore in the scenario?)?

Comment author: Strange7 15 March 2010 10:16:03PM 0 points [-]

Are you talking about vore in general, or snuffie?