RobinHanson comments on Tell Your Rationalist Origin Story - Less Wrong

30 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 25 February 2009 05:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (399)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Johnicholas 27 February 2009 03:10:57PM 4 points [-]

I've heard a story about a cat:

The cat sat sunning itself by the window for several hours. Then it got up and walked off. My roommate said "That's how we can tell a cat has complex inner life - apparently uncaused but decisive action."

Surely decisive action has more possible causes than social groups?

Comment author: RobinHanson 02 March 2009 03:30:45AM 1 point [-]

It is sudden large belief changes that are suspicious, not decisive acts.

Comment author: Raw_Power 13 December 2010 06:22:23PM 3 points [-]

How about when one does not hold one belief to be prominently truer than another, but holds on to one consistent set of beliefs that their view of the universe and their morality are based upon, and which they cannot change gradually, because that would lead to inconsistency, and then one goes and accumulates enough evidence against the individual beliefs of one set and in favour of those of another set to decide to change sets entirely.

Religion-coded and other similar worldviews are not buffets, you either take the whole menu or nothing at all. You can't divide it in bits the same way you would treat, for example, Marxism. It's all or nothing.