Liron comments on Open Thread: May 2010 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Jack 01 May 2010 05:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (543)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Liron 03 May 2010 03:21:19AM 2 points [-]

I just listened to UC Berkeley's "Physics for Future Presidents" course on iTunes U (highly recommended) and I thought, "Surely no one can take theism seriously after experiencing what it's like to have real knowledge about the universe."

Comment author: MartinB 03 May 2010 03:48:27PM 6 points [-]

Disagreed. My current opinion is that you can be a theist and combine that with pretty much any other knowledge. Eliezer points to Robert Aumann as an example. For someone that has theism hardcoded into their brain and treats it as a different kind of knowledge than physics there can be virtually no visible difference in everyday life from a normal a-theist. I think the problem is not so much the theism, but that people use it to base decisions on it.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 May 2010 04:01:07PM 3 points [-]

oh it's true. I know deeply religious scientists. Some of them are great scientists. Let's not get unduly snide about this.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 03 May 2010 07:12:19PM 3 points [-]

There seems to be a common thought-pattern among intelligent theists. When they learn a lot about the physics of the Universe, they don't think "I should only be satisfied with beliefs in things that I understand in this deep way." Instead, they think, "As smart as I am, I have only this dim understanding of the universe. Imagine how smart I would have to be to create it! Truly, God is wonderful beyond comprehension."

Comment author: RobinZ 03 May 2010 07:20:34PM 0 points [-]

[...] Instead, they think, "As smart as I am, I have only this dim understanding of the universe. Imagine how smart I would have to be to create it! Truly, God is wonderful beyond comprehension."

"Wonderful" I could believe, but I don't think John Horton Conway is actually wonderful beyond comprehension. To make an analogy.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 03 May 2010 07:26:46PM *  1 point [-]

"Wonderful" I could believe, but I don't think John Horton Conway is actually wonderful beyond comprehension. To make an analogy.

If Conway used the Turing-completeness of Life to create within it a universe like our own, he would be wonderful beyond my comprehension :).

Comment author: RobinZ 03 May 2010 07:30:13PM 0 points [-]

If Flatland would do, he could do it 'naturally' given enough scale and time. (: