gwern comments on Open Thread: July 2010, Part 2 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Alicorn 09 July 2010 06:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (770)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 10 July 2010 10:06:18AM *  3 points [-]

Programming as a field exhibits a weird bimodal distribution of talent.

Do we have any refs for this? I know there's "The Camel Has Two Humps" (Alan Kay on it, the PDF), but anything else?

Comment author: Sniffnoy 10 July 2010 06:19:23PM 1 point [-]

And going by his other papers, though, it looks like the effect isn't nearly so strong as was originally claimed. (Though that's wrt whether his "consistency test" works, didn't check about whether bimodalness still holds.)

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 10 July 2010 03:19:22PM 1 point [-]

No, just personal experience and observation backed up by stories and blog posts from other people. See also Joel Spolsky on Hitting the High Notes. Spolsky's line is that some people are just never going to be that good at programming. I'd rephrase it as: some people are just never going to be motivated to spend long hours programming for the sheer fun and challenge of it, and so they're never going to be that good at programming.

Comment author: RobinZ 10 July 2010 04:05:08PM 0 points [-]

I'd rephrase it as: some people are just never going to be motivated to spend long hours programming for the sheer fun and challenge of it, and so they're never going to be that good at programming.

This is a good null hypothesis for skill variation in many cases, but not one supported by the research in the paper gwern linked.