wedrifid comments on Closet survey #1 - Less Wrong

53 [deleted] 14 March 2009 07:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (653)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 08 November 2011 08:31:26PM *  9 points [-]

It isn't too hard to talk them into wars either - especially if you first talk someone into getting themselves killed in an appropriately provocative way. Or even just the right person.

Destroying humanity with mere words seems like a comparatively trivial task from the perspective of "is it even physically possible to do with intelligence?".

Comment author: TheOtherDave 08 November 2011 08:43:50PM 2 points [-]

I wish I could upvote this a second time solely for the understatement.

Comment author: Bugmaster 08 November 2011 09:36:44PM -1 points [-]

It isn't too hard to talk them into wars either - especially if you first talk someone into getting themselves killed in an appropriately provocative way. Or even just the right person.

I don't know whether this is true or not; there seems to be supporting evidence either way. It's true that you can point to many historical events when a seemingly well-placed murder, or just a well-placed word, sparked a major war. However, in many (if not most) of these cases, the local culture was on the brink of war anyway, and thus the well-placed murder wasn't as well-placed as it appeared -- because the critical mass could be achieved by killing virtually anyone, or even simply by doing nothing but waiting a few years for war to erupt.