Roko comments on 3 Levels of Rationality Verification - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 March 2009 05:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (182)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment deleted 15 March 2009 09:27:49PM [-]
Comment author: Vladimir_Golovin 15 March 2009 09:39:55PM *  3 points [-]

Yes, "not equals", but compression is necessary for reality-mapping, which is one of the key components of rationality as defined at the beginning of this post. There's a great quote on this:

“We can take this huge universe, and put it inside a very tiny head -- you fold it.”

Comment deleted 15 March 2009 09:44:20PM *  [-]
Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 March 2009 10:11:59PM 2 points [-]

That's, um, hardly my own innovation...

Comment author: swestrup 31 March 2009 06:22:24PM 2 points [-]

I'm only now replying to this, since I've only just figured out what it was that I was groping for in the above.

The important thing is not compression, but integration of new knowledge so that it affects future cognition, and future behaviour. The ability to change one's methodologies and approaches based on new knowledge would seem to be key to rationality. The more subtle the influence (ie, a new bit of math changes how you approach buying meat at the supermarket) then the better the evidence for deep integration of new knowledge.