Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

steven0461 comments on 3 Levels of Rationality Verification - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 March 2009 05:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (171)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: steven0461 17 March 2009 03:04:35PM 4 points [-]

As the post mentions, RD participants have an incentive to argue dishonestly. They also have little incentive to say anything informative at all. To solve this, I'd propose Paranoid Debating: everyone is scored on the correctness of a team estimate, except for one participant who's secretly designated an Advocate and one participant who's secretly designated a Naysayer. The Advocate gets more points for higher team estimates and the Naysayer gets more points for lower team estimates. Variants: give points for figuring out who the A and N are, or let it be known publicly.