VNKKET comments on How to Save the World - Less Wrong

73 Post author: Louie 01 December 2010 05:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (135)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: VNKKET 01 December 2010 11:40:36PM *  3 points [-]

Thank you for this post! One thing:

  1. Look into matching donations - If you’re gonna give money to charity anyway, you should see if you can get your employer to match your gift. Thousands of employers will match donations to qualified non-profits. When you get free money -- you should take it.

If GiveWell's cost-benefit calculations are remotely right, you should downplay matching donations even more than just making this item second-last. I fear that matching donations are so easy to think about that they will distract people from picking good charities.

Comment author: Airedale 02 December 2010 11:24:53PM 5 points [-]

I think you and Louie may be talking about two different kinds of matching donations. The GiveWell post is about an employer matching donations only to a specific charity. Some employers will hold this sort of pledge drive, particularly in the wake of an especially harmful natural disaster.

However, many employers will match donations, up to a certain level, to any qualified (e.g., 501(c)(3)) charity; I believe one can find such employers by searching the database linked by Louie.

Comment author: VNKKET 12 December 2010 07:09:10AM 0 points [-]

Upvoted for pointing out why people who I agree with were disagreeing with me.

Comment author: Louie 03 December 2010 12:40:04AM *  3 points [-]

I think if people are already here, it's more than safe to mention matching donation programs. It could actually really help motivate people. I know it helped me a lot in the past.

I once donated $3k (the limit of my previous employer's matching program) to local service charities in Austin, TX. The only reason I started investigating charitable giving in the first place was because I found the info about the matching program buried in the packet of info I got from HR when I was hired (which I got around to looking through 6 months after starting). My goal at the time was barely altruistic. It was some mix of "Cool, I can get $3,000 in extra money! I just need to find something else besides myself that I care about." and "Wow, I work for a government defense contractor. I know what they will spend that $3,000 on if I don't find something better!".

I don't think Less Wrong or Give Well existed at the time. My search for a good cause probably ended prematurely, but it still marked the beginning of a search for something outside of myself that I cared about.

Also, even though searching through information about giving to charity and strongly considering giving did almost nothing for me, actually giving that $6,000 changed everything about how I saw myself.

Comment author: VNKKET 12 December 2010 07:08:08AM *  0 points [-]

Oh, oops, we were talking about different things. I think you're right to mention matching donations (especially after hearing your anecdote), but I wonder if there's room for a warning like, "It's more important to pick the right charity than to get someone to match your donation. (Do both if you can, of course.)"

Comment author: FormallyknownasRoko 02 December 2010 08:27:20PM 1 point [-]

Sorry, I have to disagree on matching donations.

By switching a matching donation from third-world aid to existential risk mitigation, you do double your impact.

Comment author: VNKKET 12 December 2010 07:10:06AM 0 points [-]

Oh, we agree, I was just unclear about my objection. Fixed.