David_Gerard comments on Q: What has Rationality Done for You? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (88)
It's the little things.
Using LessWrong as part of my internet-as-television recreational candy diet reminds me of stuff:
Tim Ferriss' books The Four-Hour Work Week and The Four-Hour Body are full of deeply annoying rubbish, but there's quite a bit of brilliance in there too.
(I'll add more as I think of it.)
What does this one mean?
I think it has something to do with you should incorporate information from what just happened and try to come up with an effective response to things, rather than your immediate gut reaction. Is that what you were going for?
Pretty much. I mean: when something upsetting happens and you get a visceral reaction, try to catch that and engage your brain. I expect it should ideally also be applied when something pleasing happens.
Hey what does this mean?
The Pareto principle: 80% of the effects come from 20% of the effort. Really quite a lot of things show a power law.
Ferriss puts it like this:
He considers this a useful principle to apply to everything. And it is - I don't necessarily throw out the unproductive 80% on a given measure (I might want it for other reasons), but it is interesting to see if there's a ready win there. And it's useful even when you work an ordinary salaried day job, as I do. (e.g. these two weeks, when my boss is on holiday and I'm doing all his job as well as my own.)
Can you expand on asking "what's this for?". Maybe an example or two? I'm not clear on what the context is.
Particularly useful when you spot a free-floating comparative, seems to have wider application. (e.g. you just asked it about itself.) Try it yourself, for all manner of values of "this"!