wedrifid comments on What is Metaethics? - Less Wrong

31 Post author: lukeprog 25 April 2011 04:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (550)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 28 April 2011 01:47:26PM -2 points [-]

Morality is not just social signalling, because it makes sense to say some social signals ("I am higher status than you because I have more slaves") are morally wrong.

That conclusion does not follow. Saying you have slaves is a signal about morality and, depending on the audience, often a bad signal.

Comment author: Peterdjones 28 April 2011 01:59:23PM 1 point [-]

Note that there is a difference between "morality is about signalling" and "signalling is about morality". If I say "I am high status because I live a moral life" I am blatantly using morality to signal, but it doesn't remotely follow from that there is nothing to morality except signalling. It could be argued that, morally speaking, I should pursue morality for its own sake and not to gain status.

Comment author: wedrifid 28 April 2011 02:09:04PM *  0 points [-]

It could be argued that, morally speaking, I should pursue morality for its own sake and not to gain status.

That sounds like an effective signal to send - and a common one.