Recently I asked "What bothers you about Less Wrong?". It might be worth going back and checking out what people had to say, to see if there's something you can do to make Less Wrong more fun for everyone. (A few people made cool posts in response to complaints about lack of technical discussion, for instance.)
Let's hear the other side. What is cool about Less Wrong? What drew you in, what makes you stay, what makes you obsessively read every comment of every post? Is they're something we're doing right that we should be doing more? Bonus points for pointing out how we can make our awesome traits even more awesome, or how to make our awesomeness more obvious to outside folk who'd appreciate it. Whatever it is, add it to the comments.
What makes Less Wrong awesome? Its members.
People who believe that a small group is going to take over the universe to save it by making the seed of an artificial general intelligence, that is undergoing explosive recursive self-improvement, extrapolate the coherent volition of humanity, while acausally trading with other superhuman intelligences across the multiverse.
Do you really need more awesomeness?! Don't tell your doctor!
Well, Less Wrong is awesome if only for statements like this:
And that only scratches the surface! There are...
Once you grasp the full scope of Less Wrong, statements that would otherwise seem extraordinary begin to pale in comparison:
What makes Less Wrong awesome is that it shows how the most extraordinary beliefs are actually hold by atheist rationalists:
Nowhere but here can you find similar ideas:
or
or
Surely that loses points for speculating about what we already know. A simple counter would produce a bitmap of this universe's space-time matrix after a little while.