shminux comments on Rationality and Relationships - Less Wrong

13 Post author: lukeprog 08 August 2011 04:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 10 August 2011 11:01:50PM *  4 points [-]

Oh, that's out of context:

“See, I flunked. The master gave me a lesson on what to do, and I flunked. I bought her $1.10 worth of sandwiches, and hadn’t asked her anything, and now I know I’m gonna get nothing! I have to recover, if only for the pride of my teacher.”

I stop suddenly and I say to her, “You… are worse than a WHORE!”

He screwed up his experiment and was trying to salvage it. Feynman certainly never seriously thought that a woman who doesn't put out after dinner is worse than a whore. If you doubt that, read the rest of the book and "What do you care what other people think?". He absolutely liked to have fun when not in a committed relationship, but there was never a hint of disrespect. And that is probably one reason he never used this way to get laid outside of this experiment.

Comment author: novalis 11 August 2011 12:14:19AM 3 points [-]

I have read both books. And I've also read other things about Feynman's attitude towards women (search for soup).

Noticing womens' reactions to attitudes like Feynman's (that is, not 1940s women, but modern women), and treating them seriously, has helped me in my relationship.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 August 2011 11:04:57PM 1 point [-]

I have read the whole book, and I have always found this exchange breathtakingly disrespectful.

Comment author: shminux 10 August 2011 11:14:02PM 0 points [-]

I agree with you, but this experiment could not have been ethically performed on lab mice or monkeys.

And yeah, he should have abandoned it right there, rather than pushing it to this limit, as a proof that it was the model that worked, not his personal charms or maybe the bar ambiance, and conduct a new trial. Certainly would not satisfy the standard required for publication in relevant psychological journals. Then again, he was not fond of repeating it.

Comment author: novalis 11 August 2011 12:15:07AM 0 points [-]

I agree with you, but this experiment could not have been ethically performed on lab mice or monkeys.

But mere women, well, surely they could suffer for the sake of an experiment.

Comment author: Manfred 11 August 2011 12:54:08AM 5 points [-]

Suffer is perhaps not the correct word here. I think shminux is thinking of experimenters wining and dining (or not) and then having sex with monkeys.

However there is a totally viable experimental design with monkeys, if any monkeys exhibit gift-giving as a part of mating - just make sure that the males have some resource, train some to give the gift and some not to, put them in a position where they're trying to win the attentions of a female, and watch what happens.