Plasmon comments on Open Thread: December 2011 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Tripitaka 01 December 2011 06:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Plasmon 08 December 2011 07:18:32AM 6 points [-]

I was musing on the old joke about anti-Occamian priors or anti-induction: 'why are they sure it's a good idea? Well, it's never worked before.' Obviously this is a bad idea for our kind of universe, but what kind of universe does it work in?

How can they possibly know/think that 'it' has never worked before? That assumes reliability of memory/data storage devices.

I don't see how these anti-Occamians can ever conclude that data storage is reliable.

If they believe data storage is reliable, they can infer whether or not data storage worked in the past. If it worked, then data storage is probably not reliable now. If it didn't work then it didn't record correct information about the past. In neither case is the data storage reliable.