RichardKennaway comments on What do fellow rationalists think about Mensa? - Less Wrong

2 Post author: taw 06 April 2009 10:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 07 April 2009 06:58:35AM *  1 point [-]

Mensa themselves say they aim to take the top 2% of the population. This strikes me as too many to be useful. There are other high-IQ societies which are far more selective (Wikipedia's Mensa page has a list), but none of them are household names.

Comment author: Lawliet 07 April 2009 08:05:37AM 4 points [-]

Mensa themselves say they aim to take the top 2% of the population. This strikes me as too many to be useful.

Useful for what?

Comment author: RichardKennaway 07 April 2009 10:16:22AM 2 points [-]

Useful as evidence of smarts; useful as a community of smart people. I was a member many years ago, just to see what it was like. Finding insufficient reason to stay, I left.

A community has to have some sort of focus, a reason for its members to be there, or it doesn't work as one. Being a bit brighter than the mass, and "enjoying each other's company and participating in a wide range of social and cultural activities" (from their web site) strikes me as rather diffuse. The company was, like Eliezer described, like a small SF convention -- but without the SF to provide the focus. I've been going to cons for a long time, but I only went to a few Mensa meetings.

When I was a member, I also went to a couple of AGMs, where intelligence was conspicuously not in evidence.