Alsadius comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 13, chapter 81 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: bogdanb 27 March 2012 06:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1099)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alsadius 29 March 2012 08:14:16AM *  5 points [-]

"Squib" is a nonmagical child of magical parents, at least in canon. MoR seems to be using it as a genetic marker, which I'm honestly not sure is compatible with canon.

(Now that I think about it, if Harry's genetic theory is correct, doesn't a squib child of a wizarding couple imply that Mom was getting some on the side?)

Comment author: Lavode 31 March 2012 06:44:33PM *  6 points [-]

.. Not nessesarily. I just had an amusing thought. The number one use of polyjuice is quite obviously as a sex toy, right? Depending on how deep the transformation goes, it is entirely possible that the genetic lines of wizardry if anyone ever tested them would be enormously confusing, and a lot of squibs are technically the decendants of Jane Russell and Rudolph Valentino.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 29 March 2012 05:30:04PM 3 points [-]

Probably! That or a mutation, anyway. But a few weeks ago I read about an interesting situation * in which a parent with AB blood and one with A blood can have an O child without adultery, because of another gene that sometimes suppresses the A and B antigens. That wouldn't allow for varying power levels with blood purity, and would sort of be still "one thing that makes you a wizard."

  • I can't remember the name, and would appreciate if someone could remind me.
Comment author: Percent_Carbon 29 March 2012 08:33:05AM 4 points [-]

Go, Mom.

Comment author: loserthree 29 March 2012 04:02:17PM 2 points [-]

if Harry's genetic theory is correct, doesn't a squib child of a wizarding couple imply that Mom was getting some on the side?

Not necessarily. Genetic code changes in ways that do not make an nonviable specimen now and then.

Adultery is more likely, though.

Comment author: Anubhav 29 March 2012 01:04:20PM 1 point [-]

doesn't a squib child of a wizarding couple imply that Mom was getting some on the side?

Accurate deduction! Here, have a cookie.